Talk:Karanvir Bohra/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Digvijay411 (talk · contribs) 00:49, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
I do feel it is a good article according to the good article criteria.
Digvijay411
- Involved editors are not to perform GA reviews, especially when you are recently and currently involved in substantial editorial disputes over the content. DMacks (talk) 04:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, the reviewer seems to have constantly edited the article prior to the GA nomination. —Vensatry (ping) 19:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Not GA at this time
[edit]Unfortunately, marking as not GA at this time, due to recent substantial editorial disputes over the content as noted, above. — Cirt (talk) 08:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)