Talk:Karaca Cave

Turkey Low‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Caves

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caves, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of caving and cave articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CavesWikipedia:WikiProject CavesTemplate:WikiProject CavesCaves articles

It is requested that an image or photograph of Karaca Cave be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Turkey may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Sources? Information?

There seems to be a lot of biased information on this page, and it is not cited at all. Personally, I think it should be deleted. OverSS 18:55, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The information is accurate

This is the main source for the info .

http://www.kulturturizm.gov.tr/EN/BelgeGoster.aspx?17A16AE30572D313404F9755767D76FF9967B13382E62777

From REPUBLIC OF TURKEY MINISTRY OF CULTURE AND TOURISM web site . Somewhat I reworded it , there is no biased info and I deleted the parts that may not be correct . I checked other web sites too , this info seems accurate . I also got it checked with someone who actually seen the place , we believe the info is good and will serve well to whom who is interested . Still , if you don't find it good enough then replace it with something better or edit it to make it better , don’t just criticize , there was no such article before I did it . E.S. 1 Feb 2007

My primary concern was all the discussion about the "healing powers" mentioned in the cave before. I'm fairly certain there was no proof of that, though I am wrong occasionally. Just not often. ;) OverSS 21:32, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good Job

I agree with "healing powers" criticism . I asked a asthma specialist professor doctor about this some years ago , he didn’t believe in it either . I heard many things that some caves heals some lung diseases , although there might be some truth in it , it would have been irresponsible to post it on the net without solid proof , I should have put more thought in it , my bad :) You did a bonny job shaping it up anyway . Thank you . E.S. 2 Feb 2007 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.191.72.153 (talk) 16:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I've also removed the article tags (as I was the one who put them there in the first place), seeing as the issue has been adressed. OverSS 18:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Karaca Cave. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071220221050/http://www.kulturturizm.gov.tr/EN/BelgeGoster.aspx?17A16AE30572D313404F9755767D76FF9967B13382E62777 to http://www.kulturturizm.gov.tr/EN/BelgeGoster.aspx?17A16AE30572D313404F9755767D76FF9967B13382E62777

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]