Jump to content

Talk:Kansas Supreme Court

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeKansas Supreme Court was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 17, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

Review

[edit]

The article is well written but doesn't cite its sources properly. Since there are enough references in the list I think this issue can be resolved quickly. I will be satisfied if there is an inline reference for every fact stated.

There are also some problems with article's structure.

1) The subdivision of the first section is not necessary. The current three subsection should be turned into paragraphes. In addition the judicial functions are more important than administrative, so they should be moved to the begining of the section. It is necessary to provide a brief summary of the structure of Kansas judical system (distric courts and appelatte courts).
2) The second section is now called "Jurists" but more apropriate title is "Justices". The same for the last subsection in it: should be called "Removing a justice".
3) The "Composition" and "Current justices" subsections in the second section should be merged.
4) The title of the third subsection should be changed to a plural form (i.e. "Controversies"). It's not necessary to subdivide this section and it should consist simply of four paragraphs. The names of the cases can be in bold or italic.
5) It would be beneficial if every case discussed in the third section had a date when it was resolved and the number.
6) The leading section doesn't give a summary of the article a should be rewritten.

I will put the article on hold and hope the issues will be resolved quickly. Ruslik 12:53, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since nobody is interested in improving the article, I will fail it. Ruslik 08:07, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kansas Supreme Court. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kansas Supreme Court. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:55, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]