Talk:Kampfgeschwader 51
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Page under construction
[edit]More to follow. Dapi89 (talk) 21:52, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Russian campaign section will be done soon. Dapi89 (talk) 10:56, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Unsourced material; NPOV
[edit]Recent edits restored unsourced material in violation of WP:BURDEN. I'm preserving it here by providing this link. Note: I've kept the improvements implemented by editor Dapi89 (diff).
Separately, the edit also addressed euphemistic language. The article is about a bomber wing, so presumably the bulk of its operations were bombing raids. Saying "operated over England", etc. is euphemistic. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:39, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- Rubbish.
- Sortie, air raid is perfectly fine. When we don't know the exact mission type, we say "operated". It is neither non-neutral or euphemistic. Learn something about the subject or ask. Dapi89 (talk) 16:57, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- I find it unusual that an article on a bomber wing would include the word "bombing" three times and the word "bombed" just once. I do not see the same situation on the RAF bomber unit articles. How would you explain this different choice of language in the Luftwaffe articles? K.e.coffman (talk) 19:56, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- C-Class aviation articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class German military history articles
- German military history task force articles
- C-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles