Jump to content

Talk:Kalbiyya

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kalbiyya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:34, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is about the same tribe. we have two articles for the same thing.--SharabSalam (talk) 03:50, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, this article is about the modern Alawite clan in Syria. The other article is about a pre-modern tribe in Arabia with a co-incidence in the name. I don’t believe there’s any evidence of a connection. Do you have any? Be wary of folk histories where modern groups claim descent from earlier peoples based on dubious claims. DeCausa (talk) 06:51, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
DeCausa yes, [1].--SharabSalam (talk) 08:55, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
We basically have two articles for the same topic. It's probably because people here are not very well-informed about history and Arabs in general.--SharabSalam (talk) 08:58, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No it’s not. It’s because no reliable sources make the claim that they are the same. Obviously, Kalbiyya and Banu Kalb are etymologically related but that doesn’t mean that the Alawite Clan are the same as the medieval tribe. A couple of sources refer to the Alawite clan as Banu Kalb (not many though - you found one) and some sources refer to individual members of the medieval tribe as Kalbiyya. But that is very different from saying that the Alawite clan and the medieval tribe is actually the same - no reliable source says that. Linking the two is a kind of Folk etymology, not supported by historial research. We don’t have one article for Georgians, Georgians and Georgians. DeCausa (talk) 13:27, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]