Talk:Kaitlin Bennett
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kaitlin Bennett article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 June 2019. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This page was proposed for deletion by Ben Kenobi151 (talk · contribs) on 3 June 2019. |
The article says conservative activist, should that be changed to right-wing or far-right?[edit]
ˆˆˆ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.7.235.93 (talk • contribs) 19:10, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Liberty Hangout should no longer be considered "libertarian"[edit]
Their public political opinions for some time have been discernably non-libertarian, but as of (at least) August 31, 2021, they are explicitly anti-libertarian:
https://twitter.com/LibertyHangout/status/1432566216128966659
They have in their own words embraced an authoritarian Catholicism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.73.22.226 (talk • contribs) 03:46, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Infobox image changed[edit]
The original image could be construed as intentionally unflattering. I inserted the image from Commons, along with a link to Commons at the bottom. Outdatedpizza (talk) 08:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reverted a change. The previous image is so unflattering it could be considered a BLP violation.Outdatedpizza (talk) 02:00, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
- Can this be done again and have the display picture changed? It appears the same unflattering photo is being used again, what a coincidence... /sarcasm 142.186.16.25 (talk) 01:17, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
"Pants shitting incident"[edit]
Should there be a section dedicated to this alleged incident and how it is often used against her in internet discussions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C8:8B16:2D01:5419:E776:6CA4:CCB2 (talk) 09:51, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- There is already a paragraph on it.Outdatedpizza (talk) 22:50, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- It honestly shouldn't be relevant, social media gossip isn't what Wikipedia should involve. The rumor/incident has nothing to do with her relevance (to be clear it's her advocacy for gun rights). And what was thrown at her doesn't need to be explained either, just the fact items were thrown is fine enough, everything thrown at someone in any event doesn't need an explanation as to why it's one item and not another. 142.186.16.25 (talk) 01:20, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- As this person has been met with protesters who chant things about the incident, a short description of the event is justified to explain the protests. ValarianB (talk) 13:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- But the protests weren't due to the "event" so that's honestly irrelevant. The protest is about her political beliefs but the protesters just use the event as an ad-hom attack to use as additional verbal ammunition. 142.186.88.120 (talk) 22:32, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- As this person has been met with protesters who chant things about the incident, a short description of the event is justified to explain the protests. ValarianB (talk) 13:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- It honestly shouldn't be relevant, social media gossip isn't what Wikipedia should involve. The rumor/incident has nothing to do with her relevance (to be clear it's her advocacy for gun rights). And what was thrown at her doesn't need to be explained either, just the fact items were thrown is fine enough, everything thrown at someone in any event doesn't need an explanation as to why it's one item and not another. 142.186.16.25 (talk) 01:20, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- There is already a paragraph on it.Outdatedpizza (talk) 22:50, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
conversion to Christianity?[edit]
the citation does not support the assertion that Bennett was non-Christian before marriage, and that theirs was a Catholic wedding. i read though the cited source several times and amidst the gay-baiting that distractify.com does of her husband, i can see no mention of his religious denomination. ValarianB (talk) 16:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)