Talk:Kaikoura lights

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kaikoura lights article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Paranormal

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Kaikoura lights be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

This Article Needs References

I left the Royal New Zealand Air Force (RNZAF) recently, and I recall reading a copy of a report into this incident that I dug out after hearing my mother describing seeing the activity on TV when she was younger. I certainly don't recall the report being classified! They reached a pretty boring conclusion that the event was lights from Japanese squid boats combined with atmospheric conditions. I grew up in an area that had squid boats (squids are attracted to lights, so they have massive lights on them), and they created some unusual effects with light on the horizon. I'm not sure if there were two reports, but its possible chinese whispers have caused people to believe the report was classified. If such a report was classified, I suspect it would only be to protect the measures, processes, and technology in possession of the Air Force used to research the event. The maritime and strike aircraft of the time had equipment that was highly specialized and classified. After reading the report and seeing photos, I found the report and explaination quite plausable, yet still very interesting given such an unusual result. Icemotoboy 04:59, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone else think this article is very bad?

Gosh, this article is a mess. I see a user added "This sighting was soon found to be false." at the end of a sentence. I'm still trying to figure out exactly what they meant by this unreferenced statement. What sighting? The whole sighting? In which case, thats a rather big statement. Did they mean the sighting didn't occur? Was it a Hoax? Perhaps the Easter bunny is involved? I'm not quite sure, but in the meantime I have deleted that statement. Icemotoboy 23:50, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it's bad. The "Investigation" section needs references cited, as it makes some very bold and definitive statements. If they can't be backed up with information from credible sources, that section should be removed. Ninja housewife (talk) 01:11, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I second the motion. This article has been up for 5 years without verification for sources. It needs to be retracted unless anyone actually produces any real information. Here are some specifics to justify its removal. The entire very first paragraph claims 3 sources reported the incident, without showing us a reference for the actual report or the sources for the report, namely the crew of a cargo company, the pilots, air traffic control. The second paragraph is similar, an Australian TV crew, 5 people on the flight deck, air traffic control, are being claimed to be involved with varying levels of detail and vagueness without any references. NONE of these people are identified, not even the second hand sources. "I heard from a friend of a friend, and no I can't tell you who the friends are, nor the friends of those friends that I heard this from". Why is this still accessible to people as "information".BlushNine009 (talk) 19:57, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kaikoura lights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120918015705/http://www.stuff.co.nz/waikatotimes/4143125a19807.html to http://www.stuff.co.nz/waikatotimes/4143125a19807.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:04, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kaikoura lights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091219123010/http://brumac.8k.com/NEW_ZEALAND/NZSB.html to http://brumac.8k.com/NEW_ZEALAND/NZSB.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:07, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]