Talk:Kacey Wong/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 22:12, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Will start soon.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 22:12, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Some comments:
- Three Dead links.
- Citations in lead and Infobox are unecessary.
- Everything in the lead and the Infobox should be mention in the body
- Seven citations for one point is too many per WP:OVERCITE.
- More secondary sources, please.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 22:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Please note that I am on a break and editing on a mobile device is wanting. I will do further work on this when I return. Specific responses:
- I have removed one dead link, which happens to be redundant; the others need replacing rather than removal
- citations in the lead are not contraindicated, and are often preferred by reviewers for contentious assertions; i cannot do what you request from a mobile device
- As far as I can tell, the points in the lead are already in the body
- Excess citations have been culled
- AFAICT, the vast majority of citations are from secondary sources, and there are only about three from primary sources. Kindly clarify which sources you have an issue with.
- Passing, well done.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 20:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- -- Ohc ¡digame! 11:05, 25 August 2015 (UTC)