Talk:KVIA-TV

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Mid-importance).

Television: Stations

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force.

Untitled

In the mid to late 1970s, when KELP became KVIA, the station adapted the "Pro News" slogan, similar to that with KVII up in Amarillo.

Gary Warner, Al Hinjos, Robert Nitzburg and John Garmon anchored the 6 PM and 10 PM newscasts back in those days. Today, Warner is the only original anchor remaining from the days when KELP became KVIA (as well as when the station switched from Channel 13 to Channel 7 back in 1982).

The station was also the first one in El Paso to provide viewers with a weather radar. That occurred in 1979.

Anybody else who remembers the Pro News days, please pass the info along.

Fair use rationale for Image:KVIA.jpg

Image:KVIA.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV section

This is what I removed due to it being sourced by a forum post and being deliberately confrontational. Sorry it was marked minor.

On August 8, 2008 in a Pathetic attempt to compete with KTSM, KVIA Started to claim they were showing their News in HD, while Actually broadcasting in Stretch-o-Vision. this has been reported on the El Paso HDTV Thread at the AVSForum.

Drunken Pirate (talk) 05:16, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I edited it to say:

On August 8, 2008 KVIA Started to claim they were showing their News in HD, while Actually broadcasting in Stretch-o-Vision. this has been reported on the El Paso HDTV Thread at the AVSForum.

I know this is true I have seen it with my own Eyes, I Even checked the analog channel. There was no difference between the Analog and HD Channel except the HD Channel was stretched. Joeloliv8 06:38, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't disagreeing with you, I just objected to "in a Pathetic attempt to compete with KTSM", which isn't very encyclopedic and "Pathetic" didn't need to be capitilized. It should still be sourced properly or someone else might remove it. Drunken Pirate (talk) 07:51, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I figured you just wanted me to remove that part since you put it in quotes on your edit summary. I'm sorry about that, but I was mad when I wrote that for obvious reason. I forgot that a lot more people watch these articles, than the Mexican TV channel articles I'm used to editing. What do you mean by sourced properly? Do you mean put the link in the bottom part, and link to it using the numbers, because I know how to do that. If you mean find another source, I doubt I'll find one. I don't know if you're from this area, but just in case you're not, KVIA is the richest station in the entire DMA including the Juarez area. I doubt any reputable source like a newspaper, will report about this without solid proof, for fear of being sued. Joeloliv8 (talk) 18:14, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material

Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:

WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information." As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.
As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced.
WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article.
Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.

If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 18:05, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on KVIA-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]