Talk:KTAR (AM)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:KTAR (AM)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 11:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)}

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Links

Prose

Lede

• I really like the lede, aside from maybe linking "radio station" I can't see many issues. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:54, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
• there's a note in the infobox which is uncited. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:55, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

General

• U.S. Department of Commerce - link? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
• Red and Blue networks - bit of an WP:EASTEREGG links. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
• Captions that are full sentences should end in full stops.Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
• The network became the Arizona Broadcasting System at the end of 1945 as the new American Broadcasting Company sought to claim the ABC acronym for itself. - uncited Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Review meta comments

• I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
• Had a good look through this - can't find too much to critique, happy to pass. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:59, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 20:02, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that by the time he became governor of Arizona, John Howard Pyle's appearances on a Phoenix radio station made him "as familiar in Arizona homes as the family radio"? Source: https://www.newspapers.com/clip/106071806/pyle-sentimentalist-but-doer/
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Speak Now World Tour – Live

Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 21:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Sammi Brie: Good work. Article is sourced, hook is interesting, and the QPQ is done. Approving. Onegreatjoke (talk) 01:34, 1 November 2022 (UTC)