Talk:KCVU

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

I see that KBVU has been redirected to KCVU with no discussion on the talk pages of either page. Besides having the same owner what reason is there for the redirect? I am planning on reverting that in 10 days unless there is a consensus that it should stay the way it is currently. --Sjrr124 (talk) 01:02, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to know where there is a citation to prove that Pray Northstate, which aired on KCVU, was forced off the air by the FCC. If there is no proof, it must be removed. NostalgiaBuff97501 (talk) 14:01, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What channels are they?

KCVU brands using its digital channel, 20, rather than its historic analog and current virtual channel, 30. KBVU brands using its digital channel, 28, rather than its historic analog and current virtual channel, 29. Does anyone know the point of this?

KVIQ, which shares owner Sainte Partners II, L.P, brands using its digital channel, 17, rather than its historic analog and current virtual channel, 6.

Unrelated WOAY-TV in Oak Hill, West Virginia brands as digital channel 50, instead of its historic analog and current virtual channel, 4. Its article claims that 50 is its virtual channel, but the FCC database disagrees.

The article for WLIO in Lima, Ohio claims that its digital channel, 8, is also its virtual channel, instead of its historic analog channel, 35. The FCC database disagrees, saying its virtual channel is 35.

Do KCVU & KBVU make similar claims about their virtual channels? --Chaswmsday (talk) 15:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Stations#Dubious virtual channels & odd branding. --Chaswmsday (talk) 15:51, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KCVU. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130829004251/http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KCVU. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090304025527/http://www.sacbee.com/obituaries/story/1146847.html to http://www.sacbee.com/obituaries/story/1146847.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]