Talk:K-232 (Kansas highway)

K-232 (Kansas highway) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 9, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 6, 2013.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Post Rock Scenic Byway is so named because of limestone fenceposts?

U.S. Roads: State highways / Kansas Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. state highways

Locations

Kansas

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	A fact from this article was featured on the Did you know? section of the U.S. Roads Portal in May 2014.

Kansas Low‑importance

	Kansas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:K-232 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 00:11, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article immediately. T C N7JM 00:11, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have the following concerns:

You should modify the conversion template to read "17.263-mile-long" by having it read {{convert|17.263|mi|km|adj=mid|-long}}.
Done Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 16:46, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Try to cut down starting so many sentences in the lead with "K-232".
Done Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 16:46, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the first sentence in the history, I don't think it's referred to that often as "Route K-232".
Done Sorry about that...that was someone else's doing while it was on the main page. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 16:46, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Is it possible to reword the first sentence so that it reads "between Interstate 70 and what was then U.S. Route 40" or something? I think this would be better for flow, despite the current name of the road being "Old U.S. 40".
I'd rather not, but if you insist I will. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 17:33, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's okay as-is, I guess. T C N7JM 11:41, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Was the route paved when it was designated? If not, when?
I can't find this information, but knowing Kansas it's highly likely that it was. I just don't think there will be any sources out there to say. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 17:33, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at the first map that had K-232 on it is usually enough. I tried to check the map myself, but my browser won't open the file for some reason. T C N7JM 11:41, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 12:21, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"K-18/K-232 highway" doesn't sound common either.
Discussed this on IRC. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 12:21, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You start both paragraphs of the route description with "K-232" and that does look overused within those paragraphs. You should try to switch up the nouns a bit.
Done Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 12:21, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You should use {{convert/spell}} for the single-digit mileages near the end of the second paragraph.
Done Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 12:21, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will put this article on hold to fix these concerns. T C N7JM 00:49, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, all of my concerns seem to have been addressed. I will pass this article. Good job. T C N7JM 12:29, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]