This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
Hm, the image is a graphical index from the places to the epistles; and it's used in multiple epistle articles. If you're down at 17, Lilla Sjötullen, and you're faced with an unlinked "Ep. 48" and no other clues, that's pretty unhelpful. The links are small and not very conspicuous – they have to be small or the caption would spread far down the article – so we can't give the reader an index and then leave them hanging, arguing there's a link somewhere at the other end of the index! Therefore, I'd say the small amount of overlinking is necessary and justified.
"soon after the real watchmaker Jean Fredman's death" → "soon after the real Fredman's death" per this character already having been introduced in the body
Done.
Should you use "was intentionally" or "is intentionally" per the correct tense?
Changed.
Pipe to Conversion of Paul the Apostle should only be on dramatic conversation
Done.
"he wrote this first epistle he" → "he wrote his first epistle he"
The "this" seems entirely apposite here, the point is that it was this epistle, the subject of this article, that set the ball rolling. In another article we'd name it differently.
"another eighty of them:" → "another 80 of them:" per MOS:NUM
MOS:NUM says "Integers from zero to nine are spelled out in words.
Integers greater than nine expressible in one or two words may be expressed either in numerals or in words (16 or sixteen, 84 or eighty-four, 200 or two hundred). When written as words, numbers from 21 to 99 are hyphenated (including when part of a larger number): fifty-six or fifty-six thousand but five hundred or five thousand." This doesn't ask for writing these as numerals. Looking at the matter again, words for quantities of epistles are preferable to avoid confusion with epistle No. NN, so let's go for words, per MOS.
"but it was the start of" → "but marked was the start of"
Edited.
"more modern Swedish would have" → "more modern Swedish would have used"
Edited.
Last para looks good!
Thanks.
Pipe to Conversion of Paul the Apostle should only be on dramatic conversation for the img text
✓Pass now, I briefly copyedited reception and legacy, also I understand the areas where you did not implement my suggestions! --K. Peake07:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On hold until all of the issues are fixed; nice job again! --K. Peake 20:59, 29 April 2022 (UTC)