Talk:Jutlandic

Denmark Mid‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article confuses the two dialects jysk and sønderjysk (general Jutlandic and Southern Jutlandic). Jutish is often the English word for sønderjysk. 84.9.144.199 10:02, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article is definately written by a non-linguist. Mixing various facts with irrelevancies. The Jutish words for I (Æ and A) are of course not distorted forms of the eastern Danish jeg, but were developed from Old Danish æk, ak and iæk respectively. Some sort of warning template shold be added until the article is rewritten. --Sasper 09:37, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Written by a guy from Sjælland.You can see in his two comments.The problem for people from sjælland is:

every time the danish capitol gradually moved more east, it worsened the situation of Denmark.

the last primeminister from sjælland was Anker Jørgensen (and see how that ended).

Fact one:As a thumb of rule intelligence will be connected with height. Fact Two:People from Jutland are generaly higher than people from sjælland(gyldendals leksikon).

Conclusion 1:People from Sjælland are generally lesser intelligent than people from Jutland.

Conclusion 2:if you do not understand these facts ,then you are from sjælland.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.129.18.103 (talk • contribs) 23:18, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from issues of Danish regionalism (I have no dog in that race) there is the use of this word, "decennia", which I believe should be decades. Decennia literally means decades but is odd, at least to an American speaker of English. I don't believe I've seen it in anything from Brits either, so I suggest replacing it for ease of reading. As for the content, I'm no a linguist and I always find undefined linguistic jargon quite annoying in articles about languages. The fact that above items suggest it might be bunk altogether, well that sucks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.17.13.149 (talk) 00:56, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

English language is not a good example for languages with no gender as it contains articles with vestigial gender.

Compare English 'A doughnut' with 'An apple fritter'. 'An' is used before a vowel (a 'feminine' noun) and is equivalent to Fr. 'une' and G. 'eine'. Also 'the banana' vs 'the orange'. Definite article pronounced 'thee' in front of a vowel. The masculine and feminine pronunciations of 'the' correspond to G. 'der' and 'die'. In common speech often with a yod as 'Thee (y) orange'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kenif (talk • contribs) 02:47, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oy, veh. How did you decide vowels were feminine and not masculine? In fact there's nothing vestigially gender-related about this at all; it's strictly phonetic. If I say 'an inexpensive doughnut' and pronounce 'the' as [ðiː] in 'the unripe banana', have the nouns changed gender? Q·L·1968 ☿ 01:17, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jutlandic dialect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.jyskordbog.dk/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071026010330/http://www.statsbiblioteket.dk/dlh/dialekt/dialekt.html to http://www.statsbiblioteket.dk/dlh/dialekt/dialekt.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jutlandic dialect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050104084458/http://www.jyskordbog.dk/hjemmesider/ to http://www.jyskordbog.dk/hjemmesider

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:23, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Consonant table intro

Currently the introduction to the consonant phoneme table, originally added by Burdluver90, says: "Phonemes that appear in standard Danish are in black and phonemes which are only seen in the dialects of Jutland (jysk) are in bold. "

But all the phonemes are in black. Perhaps there was a problem with transcription.Ordinary Person (talk) 12:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Still living? Or already extinct?

Still, I wonder why SIL is given something looks conflicted with the Wikipedia article, SIL says that the language type is Historical, but this article looks like, as also endorsed by some other Wikimedia users, describing a living dialect, who says wrong here? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:44, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Jutish which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]