Talk:Justin Flom

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Magic Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagicWikipedia:WikiProject MagicTemplate:WikiProject MagicMagic
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm not a wikipedia expert, but the introduction bio needs serious revision. It seems like it has major bias in the last two lines: "Justin Flom’s loosely structured, gorgeously shot Magic Block Party is a particular delight featuring his signature trick "Water to Coke"[2] with "check this out" magic for the MTV Generation.[5] Not just the same old stuffing of women into cabinets and stabbing them with swords. [6]"

Gorgeously shot? particular delight? What's with the final line too? Even if it is a quote from an article, it makes no sense being in the introduction in that format. 129.236.228.218 (talk) 08:22, 28 April 2015 (UTC)billymaysrip[reply]

Divorce paragraph source

That really can't be acceptable, can it? 47.12.161.150 (talk) 06:25, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]