Talk:Just Jinjer

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 March 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

South Africa Low‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Umm audiences of 10000 people not for one band. That happens all the time for huge bands like U2 or the Rolling stones. You must mean it was the first time it happened for just jinger. You should rewrite that.

                                                                   Reponse:

OK, for the people who understand how the article was written, it is talking about 10000 people in a concert for a local band IN South Africa, which is quite an accomplishment for a country who's music industry has only started to grow in the past 10 years.

Just Jinjer

Seeing that the band recently changed their name to just jinjer shouldn't we put some kind of a redirect page or whatever and change the page's name to just jinjer? Weili 12:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move and tags

I have moved (most registered users could do that move). But the article needs to be rewritten in a encyclopedic style and referenced. -- Beardo 10:51, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Best selling South African Rock Band?

The article for Finding Beauty in Negative Spaces by Seether says that that album alone has sold more than 1,000,000 copies, therefore making Seether the best selling South Afircan rock band by a long shot, easily topping 240,000 (perhaps this sales figure is for inside South Africa alone, and should be clarified)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.52.13.226 (talk) 05:46, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Just Jinjer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050310054630/http://www.iol.co.za:80/index.php?set_id=9&click_id=102&art_id=ct2001121917070585B53235104 to http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=9&click_id=102&art_id=ct2001121917070585B53235104

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:54, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]