Talk:Juno (song)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Juno (song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Juno (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 19, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Juno (song) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 October 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 01:02, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- ... that "Bed Chem" and "Juno" were both contenders for the "horniest" tracks on Sabrina Carpenter's new album according to a critic? Source:Slate
- ALT1: ... that Sabrina Carpenter makes several euphemisms about penis sizes and sings about wanting to get pregnant on her new album? Source: Slate, American Songwriter
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Wake Me Up When September Ends, Template:Did you know nominations/Rose Betts
Converted from a redirect by MaranoFan (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 72 past nominations.
NØ 14:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems: - The hook fact from ALT0 is mentioned only in the Bed Chem article, not in the Juno article.
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: @MaranoFan, nice work on these articles. I just had one comment about ALT0, which I mentioned above, but ALT1 is good to go if you want that to be approved instead. Epicgenius (talk) 13:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- I added ALT0 to the other article too, Epicgenius. I like both hooks so frankly I have no preference.--NØ 14:27, 23 September 2024 (UTC)\
- Looks good to me. Epicgenius (talk) 14:29, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Juno (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: MaranoFan (talk · contribs) 07:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Medxvo (talk · contribs) 21:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- "She followed this with ..." - "Espresso" was followed by ..."
- "available for digital download on the album" - why just digital download, not "digital download and streaming" for example?
- "Juno" is three minutes and 43 seconds long" - I guess MOS:NUMNOTES again
- Coachella can be linked to Coachella 2024 since it has its own article
- TikTok can be linked
- "New York City" - MOS:OL
- "Jake Viswanath of Bustle believed it has ..." - "Jake Viswanath of Bustle believed the track has ..."
- Slate's Carl Wilson did say that "Juno" wins as the horniest track so I don't know why its competition with "Bed Chem" is added instead
- Ref 10 redirects to a newer version and the archived version doesn't explicitly say the announcement's date. Have you ever tried this one?
- The current version of Ref 10 can be used instead of ref 11 - a suggestion
- Ref 22; Variety can be linked
- Ref 26; limited access
@MaranoFan: One review is cute, but two, though? :) Good work as always, On hold for now. Medxvo (talk) 21:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Medxvo: I was just about to post a review at the How You Get the Girl peer review, and what are the odds? You send me a text. Thanks a lot for the review, and all of these should be done now!--NØ 19:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe it's all in my head, but I bet I'll really ✓ Pass the article now :) Happy double GAs! Medxvo (talk) 20:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)