Talk:Jungle Jam and Friends: The Radio Show!

This article was nominated for deletion on July 8, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Targetted for Deletion?

There are a number of notable things about Jungle Jam and Friends: The Radio Show! that warrant its inclusion in wikipedia. For one thing, some high-caliber, award-winning talent is involved in its creation - most notably Buddy Miller and Julie Miller. This is no fly-by-night production. For another thing, JJ&F:TRS has several seasons of material under its belt, and is still in production. It's a going concern with ongoing relevance.

In any event, it's certainly as relevant and as notable as thousands of unquestioned wikipedia articles.CrimsonLine 21:19, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree... it would, IMO, fit under the category of broadcasting history (since it's gone in & out of production, is popular with many, both children and adults... though it doesn't seem to be as widely broadcast as it was 10-15 years ago). [[User:RobSansBeard] 04:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)RobSansBeard

Working on the Problems

Clearly, this article has problems with NPOV and citing sources. I have also noted issues that are raising concerns on this article's deletion page. To start addressing these problems, I've begun pulling information on notable characters into the main article. I'll start working on NPOV and source citation, as well. - CrimsonLine 21:46, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

=AfD closed

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jungle Jam and Friends: The Radio Show! closed: keep (although tiny 2:1 vote participation does not preclude relisting). `'mikka (t) 18:38, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The question of deletion is absurd

Sure, there are some topics that could be obscure enough to not be worth putting in Wikipedia, but this is not one of them. This is a well established program that's been around for nearly 16 years, and is still broadcast on approximately 120 stations across the US and Canada, as well as online. I've found people in Africa who know and love Jungle Jam enough to have tapes of the episodes.

Amazingly creative and talented entertainment for all ages. Features positive lessons and values taught through hilariously stories!

4.255.221.184 03:13, 2 October 2006 (UTC)Kurt[reply]

Characters

Despite being stated, Gruffy Bear is NOT the main character; just because he brought the gang together shouldn't give him that status. He isn't featured in enough stories perpetually to be considered a main character. Main Character means that Gruffy is the focus of every story; he's not. The Jungle Jam Gang is an ensemble of numerous main characters; no individual is more important than another, which is shown in shows like Wonderpets and the Save Ums. Anyhow, the Jungle Jam characters are all important. In Gruffy's case, perhaps we could change Main Character to Leader, or something like that.Ohyeh 16:07, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More characters

Wow, these are bad descriptions. Some one (perhaps myself in the foggy future) needs to seriously rewrite them. Millard the Monkey sounds like the villain, the way he's characterized, Sully sounds like a goodie-two-shoe…

And, as one correction out of many, Millard is not dim-witted. "Slow-witted" or, even better, "slow on the up-take", but a monkey who discusses such topics as Joseph Stalin and the Bermuda Triangle, counts to 1,000,000, and goes to the public library to study the royal history of the Castle Montmart cannot be called "dim-witted".

— The Man in Question 05:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Gruffy.jpg

Image:Gruffy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:JUNGLE JAM.jpg

Image:JUNGLE JAM.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MillardMonk.jpg

Image:MillardMonk.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Nozzles.jpg

Image:Nozzles.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SullyAard.jpg

Image:SullyAard.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:58, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jungle Jam and Friends: The Radio Show!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060513025822/http://news.awn.com/index.php?ltype=search to http://news.awn.com/index.php?ltype=search&search=annie&newsitem_no=12403&dir=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]