Jump to content

Talk:Jumping after Wirkola

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Writing a priori and a posteriori instead of a priori and a posteriori would correspond to the a priori belief that Wirkola's a posteriori stardom was guaranteed by his a priori stardom, each time he jumped, which a posteriori might correspond to a good approximation to the truth, but which nevertheless, in the present encyclopaedic context, would be classified as a non-neutral point of view, so I re-instate the 2nd version. Slavatrudu 10:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]