Talk:Julius Chingono

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Miniapolis, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 25 February 2021. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!
Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Page is still under construction.

Untitled

Peer Review by User:Okinawalover

Lead

Your lead is fairly short, I would add a little bit more information. Make sure the info you add is concise and overly detailed.

Sourcing

You have very few sources. I would suggest looking through AUM library and check Jstor for some articles and journals if you have not already.

Structure

Your article is structured very well. I would suggest adding death to the bibliography section.

* Language

Overall, the language used was good and easy to read. The publication and appearances section was a little difficult to read. Also, for the collaborations section, I would suggest listing the poems and stories he wrote. Okinawalover (talk) 18:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review by User:Nickywithdablicky

Lead

Your lead is pretty short. I would try adding a few details to create a concise summary for the article.

Sourcing

You only have one reference, I recommend gathering some peer review articles, journals, or looking on Jstor.

Structure

Your article is structured very well by adding each sub-heading.

Language

The language was well chosen and easy to understand. In the Publication and Appearances section, you could remove most of those commas.This would eliminate most of the run-on sentences and make it easier to comprehend. Nickywithdablicky (talk) 18:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2021 and 5 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Quarantineditor.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

by User: Aumgirl2024

Lead
The lead is short but tells about the topic. You could add more information about him like what he's known for.
Sourcing
I think you should add more reliable sources. The first source that you have doesn't seem to be that reliable, as it is a books collective with no sources cited about where the information comes from. The second source you have seems to be the same. There isn't a cited section and there is no "About Us" section. I also think that you should add references behind more sentences in the article. You could look through google books to see if you are able to find more about your topic.
Structure
Overall, I think your structure is pretty good. The article is neatly organized with the sections you included.
Language
Overall, I think that the language is good. There are some minor grammatical errors in the "Collaborations" section, like "is" instead of "his", and the period at the end of the sentence.

Aumgirl2024 (talk) 07:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

english

essa6 about my old shoe by Julius Chingono 41.169.97.195 (talk) 19:47, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]