Jump to content

Talk:Juliana Schroeder

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Research fraud

[edit]

Both of you guys are misbehaving. The research fraud definitely belongs in the WP article, but it should be rewritten to be more neutral. Stop the revert wars and rewrite the darn thing. 98.166.163.235 (talk) 17:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed this most definitely belongs in the page. Read what the author write themselves on their Twitter about one of her retracted papers, https://x.com/J_R_Schroeder/status/1841939822866530412:
- "The key results in S3&4 were (barely) statistically sig due to research practices I now identify as p-hacking (here: dropping data w/ unclear exclusion rules)"
- "To end: I am ashamed of helping publish this paper & how long it took to identify its issues. I am not the same scientist I was 10 years ago. I hold myself accountable for correcting any inaccurate prior research findings and for updating my research practices to do better."
Purposely omitting data to get a desired result is fraud. 152.17.156.38 (talk) 00:24, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]