Jump to content

Talk:Julia Azari

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk06:12, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that Julia Azari has shown that U.S. presidents increasingly defend their legitimacy by claiming to have a political mandate? Source: I will give two paywalled reliable sources, but to make things as easy as possible here is the book's blurb. For real WP:RS, see Horton, Gemma (23 February 2018). "Delivering the People's Message: The Changing Politics of the Presidential Mandate". Information, Communication & Society. 21 (12): 1836–1838. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1442490; Seyb, R.P (1 December 2014). "Azari, Julia R. Delivering the people's message: the changing politics of the presidential mandate. Cornell, 2014. 206p index afp ISBN 9780801452246 cloth, $39.95". CHOICE: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries. 52 (4): 701.

Created by Astrophobe (talk). Self-nominated at 06:00, 12 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • (Long time since I did this!) The hook is hooky and short enough. The article is new and adequately referenced. The source given supports the hook and random checks of the text showed that the article is referenced well. Thank you Astrophobe. GTG Victuallers (talk) 14:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editor's note

[edit]

Seeking consensus regarding recent changes by Leontrooper: the author of a newspaper article doesn't even choose the initial headline, letalone control the kind of editorial comments that might be made when a headline is rewritten. That part of the sentence isn't due weight in a biography of a living person, it's trivia about Washington Post editorial practices. I've modified the text to at least focus on the article subject. - Astrophobe (talk) 19:43, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Usually when something in a (online) newspaper article is changed, a note is added to inform the reader. Even if the change is trivial or served to correct a factual error. That did not happen here. It's part of the news story Ms. Azari was caught up in. Leontrooper (talk) 13:51, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]