Talk:Juke (instrumental)

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

R&B and Soul Music

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

I tried to give this article a good jumpstart. Please offer any help, criticism, or knowledge. --Tornvmax 06:27, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3:4 and 2:4 time

I don't think it's right to talk about 3:4 and 2:4 time in Juke. The cited transcription in which these time signatures appear is just that: a transcription in formal notation of a live-recorded, improvised piece of music.

It's clear that Walter royally screwed up his timing in that second chorus. The remarkable thing is that he and the band managed to get back on track without spoiling the piece. (Perhaps even more remarkable is that they decided to release the track with such a huge fluff in it. They clearly recognised that this added to the piece's personality - and the charts proved them right.) And he also throws in an extra half-bar in the third chorus.

In his (wonderful) transcription, Glenn Weiser has chosen to deal with these deviations by switching to 3:4 and 2:4 time - but I guarantee that Walter wasn't thinking in these time signatures as he was playing.

Basically I'm saying that the reference in the article to 3:4 and 2:4 time is missing the real point: that the piece contains significant flaws, and it is a masterpiece despite - in fact because of - these flaws. That this makes transcribing the piece just that much harder, as evidenced by the cited transcription, is incidental to this point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.34.170.132 (talk) 12:06, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Juke (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:13, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]