Talk:Juicer

Food and drink: Beverages C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

C

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is within the scope of the Beverages Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Home Living Low‑importance

	Housing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Home Living, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of home-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Home LivingWikipedia:WikiProject Home LivingTemplate:WikiProject Home Livinghome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

WPFood assessment

Low importance C-Class article on a common kitchen implement. --Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 01:55, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A section on slowjuicers should be added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.132.163.55 (talk) 16:21, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ridiculous pseudo-scientific claims

I'd like to see this Wikipedia article extended to include a paraghraph refering one by one to the claims that different types of juicers have dramatically different health impact. There's an entire industry booming right now built around an idea that the levels of health-related compounds vary significantly depending on the extraction method. Seems somewhat reasonable but how big are those differences really? One youtuber for instance has been selling juicers on the internet and maintains that 'according to scientists' a juicer is better at killing cancer cells than a blender. He never provided the actual study though. Youtube is flooded with videos by fishy and highly ceffeinated juicer salesmen convincing their viewers that one needs to buy a $400 juicer in order to get rid off the 'evil' dietary fiber and stay healthy. It's time to put their silly marketing tactics into scientific perspective. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:115F:B32:1E00:699C:CFFF:32E0:3BEC (talk) 20:39, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]