Talk:Juggernaut (1974 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sept 2014 changes undone

User 81.129.123.121 removed two things I wrote here. He altered the sentence "Advertisements were run in British papers, soliciting extras who would take a lengthy cruise in the North Sea for free, but with the knowledge that the ship would actually seek out the worst possible weather, as the story demanded seas too rough for the lifeboats to be lowered, trapping the passengers on board." He removed the final part, "as the story demanded seas too rough for the lifeboats to be lowered, trapping the passengers on board." He said it was "unverifiable IMDB trivia". That is not true. It is the core plot of the entire film. You need only watch it to see this. If they could stop the ship and get everyone off, there would be no film. The entire film depends on the passengers being trapped, so it is vital to tell Wikipedia readers that was the reason the Maxim Gorkiy sought out stormy seas for filming. Otherwise it just sounds like they wanted to intentionally make the film crew and extras seasick for no reason.

He also rewrote this sentence: "The ship's charter was negotiated at a set rate in February 1974, while oil prices skyrocketed due to the still-ongoing 1973 oil crisis. As a result, the Soviets, who paid the vessel's operating costs during filming, ended up losing money on the deal." He said "...why would a ship be hired in 1974 when the prices rose in October 1973? Nonsense." No, I can assure you it is NOT nonsense. Oil prices did not rise in one moment in October 1973, they rose continuously, unevenly, over many months. The ship was chartered in February 1974, while prices were still rising. What that meant was that by the time they completed filming, the oil prices had risen so much over the duration of filming that the Soviet owners of the liner lost money. There is no nonsense there.

In addition, he writes about another change he made that ""Although the film was originally released in the UK under its regular title," well that's because it's original title is the name of the film. It's the difference that is notable." The reason I worded it that way is that many people seem to believe, erroneously, that the film was released in theaters in the UK in 1974 as "Terror on the Britannic". This very page said that for a while. That is totally untrue. I was trying to correct that misunderstanding.

jamesluckard 22:17, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

I've just removed the link at Hamburg, as it pointed to the city. There doesn't seem to be an article about the ship: SS Hamburg (1926) is clearly not the right vintage, I assume the ship used in the film is the one built in 1966. Does anyone have any more information?--Dub8lad1 14:07, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:34105.1020.A.jpg

Image:34105.1020.A.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:08, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Juggernault.jpg

Image:Juggernault.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:59, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Juggernaut (1974 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100531152557/http://www.chriscunard.com/qe2_history.php to http://www.chriscunard.com/qe2_history.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]