This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
From a first look, it does not appear to pass the WP:GACR6. I briefly outline where it fails:
Short lead: it is only a single sentence. Typically, a good lead is about 400 words.
Issues with prose: many events are described as single sentences. It is challenging for the reader to care. For example, it is said in the article, "Ran as an outraged, "pissed off renter" with her campaign centering around a pro-tenant agenda that included rental reforms and greater housing options." My question as a reader is, why she was "pissed off?" Spending a few sentences to provide some background describing the problem is essential. Moreover, some information about what made her choices engaging is also necessary. For example, what did the opposition campaign do? Was she the only candidate advocating for what she believed in?
Adding more wiki links; for example, you mentioned Boeing.
Missing information, e.g., how long did she work for Boeing?
Legacy, aftermath, etc. What has happened after the actions of this politician? This needs to be more clearly explained.
A good way is to describe the bills she passed and the aftermath of these bills. For example, how many houses were built if land was sold for affordable housing?
It would elevate the article if there was at least one more picture, especially as an active politician.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
No verdict yet until the above comments are addressed. Otherwise, I would have to fail it. I have not seen any activity, so I have to fail it. The article has promise but needs the extra work. A.Cython (talk) 00:52, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]