Talk:Judiciary of England and Wales

Politics of the United Kingdom High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

England High‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales High‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History

It seems that this article, and many of the ancient terms it references, have an ancient history that is entirely missing. Either the name should indicate that it refers to the present, or it should include or clearly link with coverage of the history. Ranmore (talk) 15:48, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Justices of the Supreme Court

The article as currently written appears to suggest that Justices of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom are subordinate to the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales. The England and Wales Judiciary website states that the Supreme Court is a UK body and is not under the remit of the Lord Chief Justice.

Therefore, should this section be remove from the article?

AdamCarden (talk) 23:00, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Qualification period

The article uses the phrase "must satisfy the judicial-appointment eligibility condition on a (7/5)-year basis." 6 times. How is "on a 7 year basis" different to "of 7 years standing"? The difference in phrasing implies a difference in the qualification period. If there is no difference then the simpler phrase should be used, if there is a difference it should be explained. treesmill (talk) 13:33, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

High Court article question

Can anyone answer the High Court article question posted at this link? Thank you in advance. Bo99 (talk) 14:02, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Judiciary of England and Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090221000105/http://www.england-legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2007/en/07en15-d.htm to http://www.england-legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2007/en/07en15-d.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://jac.judiciary.gov.uk/1386.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:43, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid question, but

the salaries are per year, not per month? (German here)--2001:A61:260D:6E01:8DB9:9043:E5B4:4FA4 (talk) 18:16, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They are annual salaries. I've updated them for the year beginning 1 April 2018. -- Picapica (talk) 14:30, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]