Talk:Judicial misconduct
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Judicial misconduct. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160224143909/http://www.wxyz.com/news/local-news/investigations/fmr-supreme-court-justice-diane-hathaway-released-from-camp-cupcake to http://www.wxyz.com/news/local-news/investigations/fmr-supreme-court-justice-diane-hathaway-released-from-camp-cupcake
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:47, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
The claim that the JCIO investigates judicial misconduct in the UK disputed.
[edit]The JCIO in the UK do not investigate most judicial misconduct on the grounds that it would impair judicial independence. The JCIO only investigate "personal misconduct" i.e. judges being arbitrarily rude or falling asleep in court.
Quote: "We are an independent office which supports the Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice in considering complaints about the personal conduct of judicial office holders.
We cannot accept complaints about a judge’s decision or the way a judge has managed a case." - https://judicialconduct.judiciary.gov.uk/
82.27.35.195 (talk) 10:12, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Name of the page
[edit]Should we divide this page into two, one dealing with judicial misconduct in USA and the second with that is the UK. We should also add a project to add pages about judicial misconduct in other countries? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilkn (talk • contribs) 06:33, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Start-Class law articles
- Mid-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class ethics articles
- Mid-importance ethics articles
- Ethics task force articles
- Start-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Mid-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- Start-Class Skepticism articles
- Low-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles