Talk:Josh Sims (lacrosse)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:00, 22 August 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
Two fact tags need to be cited as do the tables of stats. Just a cite in the header for each table should suffice.
Stats cited.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:50, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced removed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:58, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Can't you find any free pictures of the guy?
I have put out Flickr requests, but lax guys are not so popular and I don't have a lot of people to ask. This is not like one of the four majors where there are a lot of people to ask.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:42, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

I apologize that I have not gotten to this, but I want to see if the DYK reviewers make me do anything to this before letting it get through GAC. If asked to make some changes, I want you to look at them before putting it through.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 12:15, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Don't sweat the time; just let me know whenever you want me to look at it again. And the picture is a nice-to-have, not essential.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:30, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]