Talk:Joseph: King of Dreams

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: American / Films / DreamWorks Animation Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the DreamWorks Animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Film: Christian / American / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Christian films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Egypt Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

United States: Animation / Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

Bible Low‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Joseph king dreams.jpg

Image:Joseph king dreams.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your website is great

it can help us with our studies,and to our projects too.... i know because i am a student that needed the help of your website.. this is a project of our school i am in first year high school i gathered as many information as possilble and it reaaly helped me to do my project well... thank you again.... more power to your website and it really helps bye... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.84.162.197 (talk) 02:37, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Biblical Comparison

It'd be interesting to see a comparison between the film's adaptation of the later chapters of Genesis and what the actual Bible says about Joseph; kind of like the comparison section that they have on the Prince of Egypt article. Invmog (talk) 23:39, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems silly that the Biblical Comparison section has been flagged as original research when the same could equally be said of the plot section. Since both sections are simple matters of plain fact, not matters of opinion, why are references needed? This takes me back to my maths essay when my tutor kept asking for references for things that I'd simply proven algebraicly - NOT EVERYTHING NEEDS A REFERENCE! 94.193.214.181 (talk) 20:57, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where to begin? It's VERY different from the biblical account.--81.141.175.90 (talk) 01:22, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Marshall Goldberg

The "Marshall Goldberg" who wrote this movie is not the same Marshall Goldberg who played football for Pitt. The Marshall Goldberg ^[1]who wrote Joseph King of Dreams^[2] is about forty years younger and did not play football for Pitt -- though he did, in fact, play football for Harvard^[3]^[4]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.171.107 (talk) 05:54, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joseph: King of Dreams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.crosswalk.com/archive/joseph-king-of-dreams-520020.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:35, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joseph: King of Dreams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20140601165500/http://www.hans-zimmer.ch/interviews/danny_pelfrey.php to http://www.hans-zimmer.ch/interviews/danny_pelfrey.php
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.animationinsider.com/2013/12/nassos-vakalis/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:36, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joseph: King of Dreams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140901201406/http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/josephkd.php to http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/josephkd.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:33, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Trailer

I remember watching The Road to El Dorado VHS when I was a kid and there was a Joseph: King of Dreams trailer attached to it and the narrator specifically says that Joseph was "the next in a series of classic stories". I have the trailer in another tab but you guys have blacklisted YouTube so I am not sure how to link it or to prove it. Tyler Michael Mannix (talk) 02:07, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for Improvement

I personally enjoyed this film growing up and would love to suggest a few ways to improve this article. My suggestions are as follows:

- I would like to see more comparison to the Bible as has been mentioned by other users. Joseph is an original biblical story and you noted ministers were on staff in the production of the film. However, there seems to be more comparison to its sequel, The Prince of Egypt, than its predecessor, The Holy Bible

- Having a stronger lead is definitely an improvement that needs to be made. The introduction is fairly short and lacks well-rounded explanation of the film. A simple way to do this would be to summarize your major "points" or sections and expand on a few more important ideas. (Ex. general overview of critical response, production, etc)

- Using more specific language would be more effective than referring to unnamed groups of people. This is especially noted in the section, "Critical response". For example, you write, "Many noted that the animated hieroglyph effects were similar to those from Prince, and suggested that the film stuck closer to the Bible source material than the previous film had." This statement is vague in that it lacks a footnote or source of information and "many" is an inherently vague term.

- Overuse of long quotations undermines credibility and puts your article at risk of plagiarism. Many long quotes are used throughout the article that could be paraphrased and often, they don't stand as evidence for a clear point so their relevance is unclear. Basmati235979 (talk) 03:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.imdb.com/name/nm0325261/

[2] ttp://www.imdb.com/title/tt0264734/fullcredits?ref_=tt_ov_wr#writers

[3] ttp://www.thecrimson.com/article/1965/11/20/crimson-jvs-beat-yale-goldberg-scores/

[4] ttp://www.gocrimson.com/sports/fball/1966-67/Bios/Marshall_Goldberg

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]