Talk:Jordi Borràs i Abelló

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because there is no justification for the speedy deletion. Talk page has not been used at any time by the nominator to try to solve the issue. --Filiprino (talk) 15:39, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Sourcing

Bringing here a discussion that RichardWeiss started in my talk page. Sources stating that Societat Civil Catalana is a unionist organization appear in the first line of its own article. There is no need to add a reference that SCC is unionist if those references are included in its own article and it's an undisputed fact. Few weeks ago, when you made several edits in several articles removing this kind of information, you were required (here) to explain the reasoning of those removals. You just ignored that discussion and didn't answer the questions. That's why I proceeded with the revert. Please, if you have no prove that the position of SCC in the independence issue is disputed or can't explain why you think that information is not relevant in this article, I will have to ask you to add that information again. --Aljullu (talk) 10:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

If I demand a source you need to provide it to the article or not add the addition. There is nothing to discuss which is why I posted on your talk page and not here. Don't invent policies as justification for your claim that we don't need to reference with high-quality sources any information you add, when challenged. ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 11:12, 15 September 2018 (UTC)