This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
I myself have been looking for information on the currently unfolding sexual assault news. The article currently details these events, but provides not sources at all. Does this adhere to Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons? By my understanding it doesn't, so it should be improved. --OKNoah (talk) 09:18, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This article currently has no subsections. I propose that it it has the subsections "Career" and "Personal life"
As this would require significant rearrangement of the article's text as well as addition of new text I am opening notifying editors here before making such a change. BrendonTheWizard (talk) 22:58, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Your edits removed everything that was adequately sourced leaving only sentences that needed citations for verification. There is reason to create sections on an article as that's inherently part of the development process (see the criteria for good articles). BrendonTheWizard (talk) 23:11, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. The very person that nominated the article should not purposefully disrupt the editing process. As much as I want to assume good faith here, erasing our work and reducing the article to ten poorly sourced sentences in hopes of getting more delete !votes isn't how you get a consensus on an AfD, it's how you get sanctions imposed. I apologize in advance if this is a disrespectful personal attack but I would like to remind the AfD nominator that his reason cited was that the article was quote a poorly sourced stub covering a quote non notable individual yet he is the creator of several stub articles ranging from 2-4 sentences total covering non-notable individuals [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] and contested the speedy deletion of all of them. Bueller, I say this not with the intent of hurting or attacking you, but as a genuine request for you to have consistency in your actions. Act out of respect for policy in every instance, not because it's convenient at the time. I again apologize because this is harsh, but the situation is bothersome. BrendonTheWizard (talk) 21:46, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. It is policy that users should make an effort to improve an article before nominating it for deletion, or voting in the AfD discussion; sadly, this common-sense guideline isn't being followed here. You're completely right to point out Bueller's inconsistent actions. Davey2116 (talk) 22:57, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think more effort should be made to arrange this article into sections. The career section can simply state what he has done career wise. The allegations against him could go into a separate section. What does everyone think? I just think it could be improved to look a little neater. Geekyroyalaficionado (talk) 20:36, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Some of the references were pretty sloppy in the way they were structured, so I've tried to correct/expand the metadata on them. I've also replaced a couple of sources which I thought inadequate or irrelevant or just non-objective. There was one from what appears to a new commercial venture (Corporate Con Job?) of Jordan Chariton; using that as a source is very inappropriate and cannot possibly be taken for an objective reference. It might, however, be listed in an external links section? Or as his official website in the infobox? Geekyroyalaficionado (talk) 16:43, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think he does meet the requirements, given his position at TYT Network and the bulk of work he was involved in, and the high profile nature of the allegations being made against him. Chariton has been a major reporter of on the scene coverage for the past two years, at least. He enjoyed periods of very high popularity and acclaim. The allegations against him are a substantial story and there is ample secondary-source material to justify this page, in my opinion. I think this article should be kept and I'd like to see it improve. Geekyroyalaficionado (talk) 16:43, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
