This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has two major problems:
1) it smacks of boosterism.
2) it uses technical terms (e.g., major decision and tech falling), which are neither linked nor explained. The article should be understandable to more than just wrestling experts.202.179.26.78 (talk) 10:34, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is a serious question. As opposed to bringing it up on a talk page with no activity, why didn't you just explain the technical terms the way you think is needed? Link it or explain it however you would like. That just seems like a better, more productive, approach than straight criticism. I am sure as heck not a booster and I've never heard the term boosterism so I'm safe on that one. I did attend one of Nebraska's Big 10 rivals, though, so I am familiar with the subject of this article. Good night and good luck.--Dr Gonzo5269 (talk) 02:20, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
