Talk:Jonna Adlerteg

Jonna Adlerteg has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 6, 2025. (Reviewed version).

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gymnastics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gymnastics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gymnastics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GymnasticsWikipedia:WikiProject GymnasticsTemplate:WikiProject GymnasticsGymnastics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport: Gymnastics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women's gymnastics task force.

Women in Green: Around the World in 31 Days

This article was created or improved during the Around the World in 31 Days GA edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Green project in October 2024. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in GreenWikipedia:WikiProject Women in GreenTemplate:WikiProject Women in GreenWomen in Green

A fact from Jonna Adlerteg appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 January 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in 2018 Jonna Adlerteg (pictured) became the first Swedish female gymnast since 1958 to qualify for an event final at the World Artistic Gymnastics Championships?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2025/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jonna Adlerteg.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jonna Adlerteg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141018113747/http://fig.lx2.sportcentric.com/events/5091 to http://fig.lx2.sportcentric.com/events/5091

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Jonna Adlerteg Moskow 2013.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:37, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. CMD (talk) 01:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jonna Adlerteg/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 11:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Firefangledfeathers (talk · contribs) 16:01, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Picking this one up! Thank you, Riley1012, for working on this article. First review items will be out soon. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:01, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to note for the record that I'm accessing the Swedish-language sources via machine translation, and I'm very willing to hear it if this causes an embarrassing error. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
Spot checked 7 sources (citations 14, 28, 36, 41, 51, 56, 73 as of this version as well as sources that came up naturally during the review. Minor issues described in review below.

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Spot checks and Earwig came up clean.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
All aspects of a traditional athlete bio are present.

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Stability evident in article history.
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
All licenses at Commons pass a smell test.

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
All good.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

GA review items

Overall
1. The bit about her 2013 medal being Sweden's first European one in 50 years is repeated in the lead and body. Is it true of all Swedish gymnastics, or just women's? Source seems to say it's limited to women. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Correct, it's just women's. This is fixed now. -Riley1012 (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lead and infobox
1. "She won the bronze medal on the uneven bars at the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics." Is the relative status of the Youth Olympics low enough to break the chronological order for this? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  I would say yes because it's a competition at the junior level. Normally we put senior results first in the lead then any significant junior results. -Riley1012 (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Ok! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2. I made some copyedits, and I'd appreciate your review: diff. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  These look good to me. -Riley1012 (talk) 14:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
3. This article relies heavily on press releases from the Swedish Gymnastics Federation. This is not a disqualifying issue, as most of the press releases are being used to support straightforward facts (event results, qualifications, etc.) that are of obvious encyclopedic interest in an athlete's bio. That said, current citations 17 and 49 (article text supported: "This was only the third ..." and "She qualified for the uneven bars final at the World ...") are being used to cite claims about Adlerteg's place in history. Are there sources that can replace these press releases? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:21, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Citations added. -Riley1012 (talk) 14:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2011
1. "marking the first time two Swedish gymnasts": per source, "two Swedish female gymnasts"? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Done -Riley1012 (talk) 22:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2012
1. "the third time a Swedish female gymnast qualified": we should either say this was the fourth time or that Adlerteg was the third female gymnast. The latter is more easily supported by the citation (which doesn't mention Adomat being at the 1980 games). Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Done -Riley1012 (talk) 22:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2013
1. "allergic reaction": she mentions this among other health issues that led to her decision. Consider listing the rest or summarizing with something like "health issues". Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Done -Riley1012 (talk) 22:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2014
1. "the World Championships, the Swedish team finished 21st": mention that Adlerteg was on the team and that it was the gymnastics team specifically (in an earlier section, we use "Swedish team" to mean the whole athletic delegation). Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Done -Riley1012 (talk) 22:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2015–2017
1. "at an FIG World Cup": this is a bit unclear. The source mentions a Swede winning gold at a 2009 world cup, but it's not clear whether it was an FIG one; the source never mentions FIG. Also, FIG hasn't been introduced yet as an acronym, and linking "FIG World Cup" to Artistic Gymnastics World Cup is unexpected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Done -Riley1012 (talk) 22:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2018
1. "qualify for a World event final since 1958": just "World" could apply to many competitions. Can we just say "World Championship event final"? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Done -Riley1012 (talk) 22:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2019
1. "all-around for the first time in five years": source says four years. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Done -Riley1012 (talk) 22:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Competitive history
1. There's a stray citation below the table. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Done -Riley1012 (talk) 22:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-GA-criteria suggestions (optional)

Items in this section are based on guidelines that are not part of the GA criteria. You are free to work on them or not, and progress won't matter for GA status. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images could use brief alt text, mainly to indicate the ones in which she's demonstrating a gymnastics move. See MOS:ALT for guidance. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done -Riley1012 (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please review the links for overlinking. London and Tokyo, for example, do not need to be linked per MOS:OL. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done -Riley1012 (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In §2012, should we mention that she didn't advance to the Olympic finals? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done -Riley1012 (talk) 14:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The heavy use of press releases is not a GA disqualifier, but the overall strength of the article could be improved by using more independent sources. Some press release citations are redundant and can be removed. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:21, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done -Riley1012 (talk) 14:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT, consider using a parameter like "via" to indicate the citations that were retrieved from mynewsdesk.com. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:21, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done -Riley1012 (talk) 14:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Firefangledfeathers: just wondering if you had any further comments? -Riley1012 (talk) 23:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have more for you tomorrow! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:58, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Firefangledfeathers: Sorry to bother you again, any updates? Riley1012 (talk) 17:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Riley1012! Looks like I forgot to publish the most recent batch of items. More soon. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Firefangledfeathers, I believe I have addressed everything. -Riley1012 (talk) 22:43, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: @Firefangledfeathers and Riley1012: Where are we regarding the status of this article? It's been a while since this review was updated and with the GANR backlog drive coming up I want to make sure all potential articles are able to be included. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 21:27, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@IntentionallyDense: @Firefangledfeathers hasn't edited Wikipedia since 18 November, so I am not sure. I have addressed all of their comments and am essentially just waiting for them to pass it. Riley1012 (talk) 02:41, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Riley1012 I'd suggest asking someone over at WT:GAN to take a quick look and take over the review. You can mention that you've gotten through all of the feedback provided and just need someone to make sure the article meets criteria. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 20:38, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Riley1012: Could you explain how Competitive history is sourced? Please also expand the lead to cover early life and retirement, if only briefly. CMD (talk) 07:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CMD Hi, just to clarify, are you taking over the review? And are these your only comments? Thanks -Riley1012 (talk) 22:03, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those are initial comments I had looking into it, as Firefangledfeathers has not edited in awhile. I'm still assessing how much of the review they got through, are there any areas you think they didn't get to? CMD (talk) 00:44, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CMD It does not look like they evaluated criteria 1 or 4. -Riley1012 (talk) 01:47, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1 seems roughly covered, my comment on the lead fits into that though. 4 will have to be done through a separate read. CMD (talk) 15:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
FFF above provided the spot checks for criteria 2 and found only minor issues. FFF also looked through the body sections and identified nothing major in their review, despite leaving small fixes, and even left non-GA comments. For what remains of Criteria 1, I would ask that the lead, having been expanded now, is split into two paragraphs. In terms of layout, the year-by-year split is creating short paragraphs and I don't know if the years are worth that emphasis, but I would class this as a non-GA comment. The prose is slightly stilted in places, but not to the point I'd call it unclear. I don't fully understand the sources added to Competitive history, is Gymternet reliable, and does either have 2010? CMD (talk) 14:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@CMD Okay, I have split the lead into two paragraphs and combined some of the shorter sections. Yes, the Gymternet is a reliable database of gymnastics competition scores, but it only goes back to 2011. I thought the FIG profile had the 2010 competitions, but apparently not. I added the official results book for the 2010 Europeans and the Olympedia database for the 2010 Youth Olympics. - Riley1012 (talk) 21:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, the sectioning looks much better. A nice article. CMD (talk) 01:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 20:37, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Adlerteg in 2014

... that in 2018 Jonna Adlerteg (pictured) became the first Swedish female gymnast since 1958 to qualify for an event final at the World Artistic Gymnastics Championships?

Source: Aftonbladet and Expressen (in Swedish)

ALT1: ... that in 2013 Jonna Adlerteg (pictured) won Sweden's first medal at the European Women's Artistic Gymnastics Championships since 1963? Source: Expressen (in Swedish)
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Killing of Fernando Rios

Improved to Good Article status by Riley1012 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 34 past nominations.

Riley1012 (talk) 16:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Both hooks are fascinating and appropriately sourced. Just promoted as GA so timing is good. Image is good for a run at DYK. Great job! ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]