Jump to content

Talk:Jonathan Idema

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The role of speculation and citation in this article?

[edit]

The second paragraph of the Afghan section currently reads:

"However, it is precisely because of his high profile and openness with the media that it is unlikely that Idema was officially connected with any branch of the military; covert operatives go to great lengths to avoid public appearances and media contacts. It is more likely, though, that Idema was operating in Afghanistan via independent financial backing, seeking the US$25 million bounty posted on bin Laden..."

Well, that sounds like speculation to me. My understanding of the no original research policy is that this kind of speculation can be included -- if the article is citing or quoting a verifiable, authoritative source.

There are verifiable sources that quote the claims Idema made in the Afghan court. Here is one:

Here is the key part:

"In front of the judge is the receipt that the FBI signed. Why did the judge allow the FBI to take evidence from the NDS?" Idema questioned, alleging that 500 pages of documents, 200 videotapes and at least 400 photographs had been seized.
"Now it's at the US embassy where no one is ever going to see it."

I'd like to include Idema's claims. Trouble is, it doesn't fit if the article already takes a stand that he is a fantastist.

So, if that 2nd paragraph came from a verifiable, citable source, it should be cited. Agreed? If it is the speculation of one of our fellow contributors should it be cut? Shouldn't we be setting the facts before the reader, and letting them make up their own minds? -- Geo Swan 19:26, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is a reference to "Yunis Qanooni" in the later section that's currently red-linked. Should this be "Yunus Qanuni"? --Bearda 15:09, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can't seem to verify the last paragraph that Idema had been cleared of all charges. The linked article seems to have disappeared, and all other sources state that Edward Caraballo was released, but make no mention of Idema being cleared. Does anyone else have support for this claim? -- Bearda 16:00, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The latest is that Idema was suing the US Government (State Dept) for a habeaus corpus court documents show that he is not being held by the U.S. government and voluntarily chooses to stay in Pulicharki there is no reason. In my opinion it appears that Idema is trying to prevent being deported by the Afghan government to U.S. jurisdiction since he is directly resisting efforts of the consulate to assist in his repatriation. Idema wants to fly to New Delhi where his Tajik supporter Karim Khallili is ambassador. It has also been determined by the U.S. consulate that Idema is not destitute and has ample funds. Meanwhile Idema seems to inventing a story that he is being held against his will when in fact court papers show he is resisting deportation. So once again its important to focus on facts and remove any unfounded or false statements generated by Idema or his associates. Some of whom have been editing his bio. Thankfully it has been corrected. And I would like to apologize to "alcarillo" who I had previously critiqued for his reversions. I think we both see eye to eye on what constitutes useful additions and he also has a better understanding of certain disinformation techniques used on Wikipedia on this particular topic.

RYP

So you're saying he's in jail because he won't leave? What a nut. 66.104.8.66 20:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article too long

[edit]

This guy is a pretty unimportant person to have such a long and detailed article. Most of which is unsourced and frankly not well written. I think this should be hammered down to one or two paragraphs. protohiro 01:02, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree. It's not too badly-written and it's interesting, even if he *isn't* very important. 146.115.45.103 01:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC)L.[reply]

Idema's imprisonment alone is worth examining Here we have an American citizen operating apparently solo in a war zone, who managed to provoke the ire of the U.S. military. As for the stuff about his background, it certainly adds color to his persona. Still, this article suffers from a lack of verifiable sources. Alcarillo 17:25, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm suprised at how little media interest there is on Idema. I learned about him from a small excerpt in Newsweek. This article may help to fill this lack of information.Xpanzion 03:20, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if this is of any use, but there is a 45 minute video from 2005 on YouTube about private armies in Afghanistan and a significant portion is an interview of him in prison, making the claims about American and Northern alliance connections. The documentary was aired on SkyOne

http://youtube.com/watch?v=pCe2mso-uWc 2602:304:AEB7:BC0:FD4C:2B19:E8B4:BDC6 (talk) 00:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article Expansion

[edit]

After reviewing lots of articles about Idema it seems like information is very scattered. A typical web surfer would probablbly either see just one side of the story, or would get frustrated with the difficulty of finding information ang give up. I think this is a great place to sum up this intriguing biographical information.

I'd like to see the following aspects covered at least:

  • List of videos from Idema commonly seen on TV
  • Compilation of any other material that was widely distributed after Idema handed it to the Media
  • More information on his associates including his attorney
  • Lots of other stuff

Xpanzion 04:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Idema's military record

[edit]

Could someone clarify or expand on this section? The terms use jargon which need to be explained, such as:

Idema was repeatedly recycled just to get through training group and failed 05B training twice and was then recycled into 11B training.

What does this mean? Was he, or was he not a Green Beret? According to Robert Young Pelton's book Licenced to Kill, Idema was honorably discharged in February 1978. In light of the controversy surrounding Idema, the article needs to have sources confirming his military record. Alcarillo 16:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

05b training is special forces radio training. 11b training is for the MOS(Military Operations Specialty) of an infantryman. Many sources say that Idema was in special forces radio communications including Cao's blog. The word

recycled

probably subjests that Idema was sent back to more elementary training before retaking the special forces class for the third time. The only place I can find with the information about Idema failing this training is on the Stupor Patriots site

[1] The information is posted as an email from someone with Cao's blog. If anyone can find a more reliable source please reference it. If not this paragraph should be deleted. Xpanzion 23:37, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. I will de-jargon it. Alcarillo 20:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of the information in the military service section seems to be from the stupor patriots site. I already removed the part about his father getting Idema back into special forces training, I can't find anything even close anywhere else. A more reputable source should be found for the information on Idema's military career.Xpanzion 23:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree. The more I've been looking into that site, the more I question it's veracity. I've requested from the site specific, verifiable information, especially regarding court records stemming from the 1994 wire fraud case. However, I've gotten no response, nor has my own research turned anything up. Same holds true for the pro-Idema sites out there as well -- it seems to be a sand-kicking match between two sets of bloggers. Curiously, it seems to revolve somewhat around Joseph A. Cafasso, another guy whose military record has been called into question, and who has been the target of a lot of attacks on pro-Idema sites. Alcarillo 23:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cafasso now has a user ID of his own: Peppetters (talk · contribs).
Regardless, I anticipate a lot of surreptitious editing and/or vandalism to be done on this AND Cafasso's article, especially now that there will be renewed interest in Idema in the light of his impending release. Alcarillo 15:59, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Special Forces

[edit]

Idema's supporters claim Idema worked in many countries with special forces. Wide Awakes Radio His military record does not include any combat experience(this statement is included in the article), the argument for his international involvement has more to do with unofficial work, some of it outside of the military. Supporters of Idema are not made less credible by pointing to a lack of military records. Lets make sure both sides of this aspect of the story are articulated ; )Xpanzion 02:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC) Jack and his team were attached to Delta 1 teams on more than one occasion starting in Central America. Honduras, Dominican Republic and Nicaragua. He was also at the Senate Hearing in the latter 70s and displayed how a 'dirty bomb' could be made from the radioactive elements obtained by a conjunct of two FBI/CIA agents brought back from not Lithuania but another black market source... There seems to be an unusual amount of abundance of scrubbed material regarding Jack Idema for someone not important. In fact all the credible information is gone, including pictures of Ronnie Reagan getting certified at Counter Group...which was run under a Majors name out of Pope AFB.. a lot of very wrong and tainted information about Jack here. Including his relationship with the Baptist Church group in NC. Information about Vickie is missing, his seaplane which was given to him from a government impound... a lottttt of information has been purposely scrubbed, deleted, tainted or white-washed. Jack did black bag work...[reply]

Neutrality

[edit]

Looking at the article history, with its vandalism, reverts and other POV issues, it appears to be quite a back-and-forth between Idema and/or his supporters and Idema's critics. Therefore, I think the neutrality of this article has been compromised. At the very least, especially in the section "Unverified claims", the editing conflicts show with statements contradicting themselves. If information is not citied with verifiable sources, or if it violates wikipedia policy on point of view, it will be removed. Alcarillo 17:22, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I just removed a clearly emotional and biased section which was written by a critic. Obviously the subject is delicate, but we need facts not opinions. Skirts89 (talk) 07:23, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removed

Idema claims to have been active within the Army Special Forces during the early years of the civil war in El Salvador as part of Operation Quicksilver and aided in the training the El Salvadoran troops.[citation needed] It was reported that Idema was in El Salvador at the time but that he was in-country as a civilian and not operating with any military unit.[citation needed]

It was the first paragraph in the section of unverified claims. I could not find this information anywhere. The closest thing I found was on Wide Awakeness Radio. It mentioned many countries of Idema's activity, but did not mention operation quicksilver. WAR Xpanzion 18:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The POV issue seems to have worked itself out (or at least the pro/anti-Idema camps have left this article alone for a while). So I removed the NPOV tag... Alcarillo 17:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unverified claims

[edit]

I'm removing this section slowly. There shouldn't be unverified claims presented for a living person, especially if they include negative claims. I have spent lots of time looking for reliable sources to cite, then when I found something that was unfounded I removed it completely. Some of the material was verifiable and I moved it to other sections. There is one positive unverified claim that I can't confirm.

Afghani press reports indicating Idema, and other Special Operation Forces were in Afghanistan in the 1980s and 1990s, during the Soviet Invasion, occupation and subsequent retreat were not found to be in error as far as Idema's participation is concerned. Idema did in fact have to be 'rescued' from the orginial Parlichuke Prison

If anyone can find a reliable source with this information please put the information in the Afghanistan section or military service.Xpanzion 05:21, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed warlordsofafghanistan site

[edit]

An anonymous user added this external link to the article, which I removed because it is a commercial site promoting the site author and/or a specific product: Warlords of Afghanistan: Jonathan Keith Idema. (see the relevant Wikipedia policy on external links to avoid) Alcarillo 16:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Idema was in fact at Saderat and was taken from there after about three months of torture to Pulacharke by the Northern Alliance, who are now treating him as a POW in accordance with the Geneva Conventions. Idema's Pulacharke ID card does not show him as a 'torturer' but rather as a 'political prisoner'. Edit was made by anon User:71.201.58.196

What does this have to do with the warlordsofafghanistan.com site being removed? Alcarillo 20:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Source of Funding

[edit]

How did Idema pay for equipment, housing, and workers? At least one source said he payed the cameraman. Did he pay Bennett as well? He sold some material to news companies, but what money did he use before he began to sell material? I'm not sure if a definitive answer can be found, if not a list of theories would be useful. Xpanzion 22:02, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is interesting. From what I've read, Idema would often sell his "expert analysis" to correspondents in Afghanistan, usually for a few hundred dollars. There was one incident I believe recounted in Pelton's book when one reporter basically refused to pay Idema anything and Idema went off. So much so that the reporter feared for his life.
As for other sources, maybe he solicited donations from his supporters. And if he was truly a con artist, he could have used those skills to acquire cash. Alcarillo 17:10, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Update: I found an article here that may provide some info. Haven't thoroughly read it yet, but this part really got my attention:

"The investigation by ICE, the FBI, DEA, and IRS revealed that Alocozy’s business had been utilized by Jack Idema, the former Green Beret-turned bounty hunter who is currently imprisoned in Afghanistan for allegedly torturing Afghan civilians. During the investigation, Alocozy provided ICE investigators with copies of business ledgers indicating that Idema used Alocozy’s business to send funds from the U.S. to Afghanistan, presumably in support of his quest to capture Osama bin Laden and collect the $50 million reward.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alcarillo (talk • contribs) 19:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Thanks for the info. I see another website related to Alocozy here. Xpanzion 00:57, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Another source of funding (and this seems the most verifiable) was the lawsuit Idema won against former business partners. I believe it was a $1.8 million judgement, of which he was entitled to $650,000. See the abstract of the second article from the Fayetteville Observer. [2] Alcarillo 00:01, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Counter Terrorist Group US

[edit]

Solid information about this group would improve the article greatly. Idema seems to have gained credibility through his relationship with this organization, also he may have recieved funding. The article currently states that Idema founded this group; however a google search for "counterr group" reveals sites that don't consistently state that Idema owns, or founded this company. I cannot find a stock listing for this company. The company website contains pictures of Idema, so there must be some relationship with Idema.

It makes me wonder if the company actually is owned or was founded by Idema. If not, what has Idema done for the company? Does the company actually do anything? What customers, if any, has this company advised? Who else works for them, and who fronted the money for its formation? If the website is truthful about the scale of the companies operations, which supposedly include a helicopter shooting range, then it must have been expensive to construct the training facilities.Xpanzion 19:49, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to a Soldier of Fortune article published in 2004, after his arrest, Idema is mentioned as the owner.[3] I presume that's still the case. However nothing comes up with the North Carolina Secretary of State's office under that name (interestingly, Idema Combat Systems still does)[4]. But it is still registered in New York State -- and listed as "inactive".[5] However, it still seems to be a vehicle used to promote Idema's Afghan adventures. Alcarillo 23:52, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This portion of the article seems somewhat misleading to me. It makes it sound like this entity existed only in someone's imagination or only on the web. This is far from the case. I personally met and knew Kieth in the 80's, and attended training seminars at the Counterrgroup facillities in Red Hook NY, just north of Poughkeepsie. The facilities abutted an airstrip and FBO owned by his family. Training facilities included: Conventional pistol and rifle ranges, urban assault and "jungle" assault ranges, rapelling tower, sniper ranges, and a commercial aircraft fuselage used for close quarters combat training. I still have some documentation from the seminars and other Counterrgroup literature from that time. Kieth was clearly the founder, director, and primary training instructor in all ventures, and had a trained paramedic on staff (also combat trained) as well as an assistant trainer during my time there. While I can not reference specific contracts carried out at this facility or the agencies involved, it was a going concern as the property owners in the area often complined publicly about the sound of gunfire at all hours of the day and night. The article should be revised somehow, while the documentation of ownership in the public record may be sketchy, there is no question that Kieth "owned" it, founded it, managed it, and it did what it advertised.199.224.75.86 (talk) 06:08, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That may be the case, but the point being made (and supported) in the article is that Counterr was registered in New York in 1983 and is now "inactive", and that there is very little to go on as to what it did aside from anecdotes and hearsay. If you wish that the more be included about Counterr's activities during that time, by all means include them -- but note that that information must be verifiable. If you look at the entry on Counterr at the New York Department of State's page, an agent is listed. Perhaps you or someone else could contact this person and request that information and supporting documentation be supplied here. Alcarillo (talk) 19:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Fayetteville Observer

[edit]

I was able to find several articles pertaining to Idema published in The Fayetteville Observer[6] Some of them are archived and as such, not freely available. However, searching for "Idema" in the archives will yield the name of the article, the date of publication, the author, as well as some lead-in information. For the purposes of article references, where I could not get a URL for the article I included the article's ID number, which also shows up in the search results. Alcarillo 17:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent AP story

[edit]

That recent AP story is looking dubious, now that Idema's site Superpatrios.us claims he refuses to leave Afghanistan without the dog. Pleasantville 14:37, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily. The AP wire story said that Idema was only scheduled to be released, not that it had already happened. I can imagine that the wheels of bureaucracy in Afghanistan move very slowly. Alcarillo 15:05, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Idema Editing

[edit]

I have been noticing that people here have been overlooking the facts and adding unwarranted equivication about his criminal, arrest and military history.

Idema is not an American independent security contractor

He still is serving his sentence in PuliCharki

He didn't "allegedly" run a prison he is in prison for kidnapping and torturing afghan citizens.

I could go on but this entry simply gets too much fact deletion and fantasy addition.

Idema entered for National Geographic to do a documentary on Ed Artis, returned with tickets purchased by ABC news to do a reality show and anything he says about anything he was doing has to be weighed against the facts represented by his agent selling footage rights, his litigation threats and lost suits against media organizations. Covert operators don't do reality shows and hawk the film rights to TV. Also I noticed that much usable information has been deleted from this profile which shows that Idema's crew is busy trying to rewrite history and suppress information.

ConTerr (the emphasis on "Con") is the business vehicle Idema has used to pretend that he has some official function related to terrorism (not related to his terrorizing of afghans and us citizens via his and Lynn Thomas's website. His business cards and logo are deliberately used to mislead people into thinking he is affiliated with federal, state or local law enforcement.

Idema has about 6 known supporters: his father, his lawyer, Lynn Thomas, Thomas Bumback, Jim Morris, Ted Kavanaugh and of course himself. If you want to take their word over the U.S government, the large number of published and fact checked articles and pretend their is some conspiracy, you do Wikipedia and he truth a disservice. He publishes modified press articles on his site, issues false statements, threatens women, children, afghans and now even Karzai. Don't fall into be a hatemonger or stooge for a con man.

You can find a chapter on him in my book and a simple google will lead you to a number of accurate articles.

Hm, where to begin... First of all, please sign your posts using four tildes. Thanks. Also, if you are implying that "Idema's crew" is somehow behind the ongoing edits then you could do a little research yourself and see that this page isn't exactly warmly received by that particular group.
Secondly, there has been a minor problem with finding verifiable sources, aside from general reportage about Idema's arrest, trial and sentencing. Great pains have been done -- not just by me, but by other editors -- to try to ensure that the information here is adequately sourced and verifiable. That precludes whatever is circulating around the blogosphere, pro- or anti-Idema. The term 'independent security contractor' is about as verifiably real to the truth as one can get, with the exception of 'mercenary'. Then again, for the purposes of this article, there has to be some proof. Idema claims he's a government-sponsored cover operator. The government says he's not. What does that make him? 'Liar' isn't exactly an objective term...
Lastly, you refer to other 'accurate articles' as if none of us have taken the time to search for such sources and incorporate them into the text. Some, like myself, may be limited almost exclusively to Internet searches -- and I'm sure you're well aware of the shortcomings of that medium in terms of accuracy. Moreover, many news outlets do not offer free access to story archives. That limits most news searches to a few months, at best. Therefore, I invite you to actively participate in this article by either incorporating those articles yourself, or referring them to myself or someone else like User:Xpanzion who have worked extensively on this article, and who would be glad to help improve it instead of complaining about its quality. Alcarillo 17:26, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Postscript: I suggest taking a look at the article's reference list first to make sure we haven't already covered those sources, including Licenced to Kill. Alcarillo 18:39, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is this addition supported by the citation it is inserted in front of?

[edit]

See http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Jonathan_Idema&curid=880676&diff=154197414&oldid=153094374 --Pleasantville 18:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

From ABC News: New Al Qaeda Tape Surfaces Despite US Efforts to Block It. Article reports, "Al Qaeda also showed a video it said was captured from a US bounty hunter, Keith "Jack" Idema, as he appeared to threaten to kill an Afghani citizen during an interrogation." --Pleasantville (talk) 16:58, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HAHA. Al Qaeda been duped into the Idema con... Alcarillo (talk) 18:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is funny, I'm surprised this guy is still making the news. I wonder why ABC news seems to be the only organization linking the Idema video with Al Qaeda's anniversary video. The title of this section isn't quite right because Idema is not in the latest Al Qaeda video, his video was an attachment according to ABC
"Al Qaeda also showed a video it said was captured from a US bounty hunter, Keith "Jack" Idema, as he appeared to threaten to kill an Afghani citizen during an interrogation."
I wonder how Al Qaeda could capture a video from Idema? He tried to sell some of his videos, and other videos could only soil his reputation, so he was probably careful with any copies of videos. In the beginning of the video Idema mentions that December 2001 was 2.5 years ago, that puts the date of the video somewhere near June 2003. Al Qaeda released a video that was more than 5 years old packaged with their anniversary video? The video certainly does not make Idema look good, partly because Jalalabad is not a tiny place, it is the capitol of Nangarhar Province.Xpanzion (talk) 22:01, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph A. Cafasso

[edit]

Issue needs to be revisited due to recent events. Viriditas (talk) 00:32, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you clarify? What recent events are you referring to? Alcarillo (talk) 17:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't have time for games. It's been previously discussed on this very talk page, and it's currently in the news. If you are an active editor on this page (and by all accounts you are) I don't see how you could profess ignorance on this topic, so your question is strange. The current article makes absolutely no mention of Cafasso, which is again, strange. Please don't bother replying, as I have no interest in this topic. Viriditas (talk) 09:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
For someone who apparently has no interest in this topic, it's bizarre that you would even bring it up in the first place, and then respond is such an equally bizarre manner to a legitimate question. Whatever. This is more circular logic that is at the heart of the silly rivalry between two con artists: Idema and Cafasso. Idema's whole defense seems to be that he was falsely debunked by a known con artist, therefore Idema's own claims are legit. Cafasso just seems to be an attention monger who feels some shred of notoriety at the fringes of the Idema story. The two deserve each other, in my opinion. Alcarillo (talk) 20:43, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I should also add that one of Idema's supporters convinced him/herself that I was Cafasso, apparently based on the similarities in my WP username and "Cafasso", like some cryptographic device. And this person was quite smugly satisfied with the discovery. I got a good laugh out of it.[7] Alcarillo (talk)

I have added a mention of the new article describing the police report in which it is claimed that Idema attempted to acquire a laptop used by jailed imposter Joseph A. Cafasso. I presume that was the "recent event" referred to. --Pleasantville (talk) 16:43, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox occupation = Vigilante ?

[edit]

Is this an appropriate overall occupation for this subject's infobox?

Thanks, --4wajzkd02 (talk) 23:53, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good question, regarding Idema's occupation. From the records provided, it appears that he's involved in various businesses, some legit, others of questionable legality. But since his notability is derived from his activities in Afghanistan (running a private prison and torturing civilians, for which he was tried and convicted), I believe Vigilante holds. From the first sentence of that article:

Alcarillo (talk) 20:19, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lithuania

[edit]

What that "Lithuania" part has to do with Lithuania? No Lithuania is ever mentioned within the text. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.118.46.117 (talk) 23:16, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That section needs a retwrite, but crux is (see https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/the-shadow-warrior-jack-idema-232967/) - Jack was hired to train Lithuanian cops, and he claims to have discovered a bomb smuggling plot in Lithuania. 83.255.116.83 (talk) 21:56, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Idema in Mexico

[edit]

I removed unsubstantiated information about Idema's supposed activities in Mexico. A search of this site came up with two articles, but they are in Spanish. It's not a language I know, and engines like Google Translate probably aren't good enough.

It would be helpful for an experienced editor who knows Spanish to add information, and cite accordingly, from the following:

http://www.sipse.com/noticias/59483-ubican-bacalar-mercenario-estadounidense.html and: http://www.sipse.com/noticias/59672---puede-aprehender-boina-verde-alor.html

Halda (talk) 18:09, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update: info has been supplied by anonymous users but the Bacalar section still needs rewriting and proper formatting. And the introduction para is starting to lean toward BLP vio. I check in with this article from time to time, but have decided to leave the editing maintenance to others. As events in Mexico play out, I'm sure this article will get some more attention. Halda (talk) 15:18, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bias or unreliable source?

[edit]

After reading much of the article, the line "He had left two times to Afghanistan on the orders of General Boykin,[41] from whom he took orders from most his life. " sourced from "democracy now" seems to contradict the article. Is the source wrong, lying, or is the rest of the article lying? Seems like a guilt-by-association piece of propaganda if the source is lying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.152.124.130 (talk) 13:52, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This line seems to have been deleted from the article. Skepticalgiraffe (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jonathan Idema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:39, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jonathan Idema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Jonathan Idema/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The pictures need fair use rationales. The fraud trial needs to be in the lead section, because it is mentioned in the section military service before even the fraud allegations are mentioned. The paragraph mentioning his scuba diving is best left out, as these kind of unsubstantiated claims cannot be proven this way. The first paragraph of Afghanistan, mentioning the charges against Idema, is completely unnecessary at this point. This section simply needs to describe his travel to Afghanistan, the charges should go to Arrest trial and sentencing. Errabee 11:07, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 11:07, 20 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 20:28, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Cleaning up

[edit]

I've been trying to clean this article up a bit.

I'm deleting this tag: "This article relies extensively on quotations that were previously collated by an advocacy or lobbying group. (March 2012)". The article now seems to have sufficient citations to reliable sources, including BBC, the Economist, The New York Times, the Washington Post, that I don't think that this is accurate. I'm also deleting this tag "The neutrality of this article is disputed. (March 2012)" in that the information is mostly referenced-- for the moment, I am not deleting the similar tag "This article may be unbalanced towards certain viewpoints. (March 2012)" in that perhaps there may be other sources I'm not aware of (although whoever added this tag should have started a discussion of this in the talk page). And, finally, I'm deleting the "This article's factual accuracy is disputed. (March 2012)". Disputed by whom? If some of the facts are disputed, please tag those specific facts with a "citation needed" tag. Skepticalgiraffe (talk) 19:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jonathan Idema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:45, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jonathan Idema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Jonathan Idema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jonathan Idema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:20, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Military service

[edit]

To be clear, did he ever officially even serve in the military? 2601:587:4300:97D0:4408:F878:145:AD64 (talk) 14:36, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jonathan_Idema&oldid=1252603124"