Talk:Jonathan Bennett (actor)/Archive 1

Archive 1

Fair use rationale for Image:Jonathan Bennett.jpg

Image:Jonathan Bennett.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Sexuality

Will someone please stop deleting the gay controversies that so many media outlets have talked about. Im sorry if some little girl has a major crush on him and keeps deleting it... but the couple had been spotted and photographed out together many times and I provided sources!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.45.228.153 (talk) 17:03, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

You have only provided gossip. It doesn't matter if he is gay or not, anyways. It isn't what makes him notable. We are not a tabloid. BOVINEBOY2008 :) 17:06, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Gossip is exactly what it is to treat someone as though they are a couple just because they are friends, hanging around together or going to events together with one another does not constitute a gay couple. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.126.144.65 (talk) 14:52, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

It is also considered a form of descrimination when an assumption is made someone is gay because of a mere photograph, and you have not provided proper verbal proof of both individuals stating they are gay. FAIR USE RATIONALE: Your links of proof take you no where on the internet except to Wikipedia again and no photo to be seen, etc. I question how correct the information is on this website, especially when so many people out there use this information to compile reports, for work, college reports or thesis, and grammar school reports and you have inadequate proof of information entered by just anyone without signing in. Also once you enter the information it doesn't appear to be removeable, although you give the impression that you are allowed to delete improper information.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.126.144.65 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 2 May 2010

You mean "discrimination"? --98.246.156.76 (talk) 01:23, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

"The Missing Link"

I had to rescue this article from being blanked, and it wouldn't let me restore the article unless I removed the citation from examiner.com. So I did. That's the only change from before the article was blanked. Escapepea (talk) 22:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Was he a magician I think he was

He doess magic i think 2600:387:F:4336:0:0:0:6 (talk) 02:56, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

I believe you’re thinking of Justin Willman. He has also hosted some Food Network baking shows. 172.242.164.140 (talk) 01:31, 23 October 2023 (UTC)