Jump to content

Talk:Jon Stewart–Jim Cramer conflict

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeJon Stewart–Jim Cramer conflict was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 18, 2009Articles for deletionNo consensus
May 6, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 21, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Jim Cramer's appearance on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart led to The Daily Show website's highest day of traffic in 2009?
Current status: Former good article nominee

Can't this be merged into another wiki?

[edit]

This wiki seems a bit odd, like it was a subsection of another wiki and somebody just ripped it out. "John Stewart's 2009 criticism of CNBC" certainly reads like it should be a subsection somewhere. I can't think of a good place to put it other than maybe on CNBC's or Jim Kramer/Mad Money's Wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tunafizzle (talkcontribs) 16:33, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


And how does this deserve its own article? Pathetic Jon Stewart fanboys... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:D:CC00:727:10E6:6050:7CBD:AB34 (talk) 20:59, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't agree more. Solntsa90 (talk) 14:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jon Stewart's 2009 criticism of CNBC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:21, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jon Stewart's 2009 criticism of CNBC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:48, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]