Talk:Joint Agency Coordination Centre

Joint Agency Coordination Centre has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 19, 2015. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Joint Agency Coordination Centre article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Australia: Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal Joint Agency Coordination Centre is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Malaysia Low‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

A fact from Joint Agency Coordination Centre appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 March 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Joint Agency Coordination Centre was established by Australia to coordinate the search for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joint Agency Coordination Centre.

Wikipedia

Division

This is just a note, not really a topic for discussion. The organisational chart for the DIRD in August 2014 (internet archive...the only archived version of the PDF webpage available before my save today, 18 March) does not include the JACC, although it is included in the 10 March 2015 version. This doesn't have any significance, it's clear the JACC was established within the DIRD in March 2014, but I just thought it's worth noting on this talk page. AHeneen (talk) 00:38, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flaperon

I suppose there is now no need for any mention of the flaperon find on this page? 220 of ^Borg 05:49, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. AHeneen (talk) 22:49, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Joint Agency Coordination Centre/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 08:34, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On it. Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:34, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

This is quite close to GA, the following things need to be taken care of:

It feels like the "History" section should have a different header, since it features more than the mere history of the JACC.
Also, that section should probably be updated with the new developments?
The "Relatives of passengers" section should be merged into "Activities".
Reference #6 is a dead link.

That's about it. Good work so far! I am placing the review on hold for seven days. Zwerg Nase (talk) 21:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the deadlink and added an archived version of it too. I could not think of a better title for the History section, so I divided the section into two subsections (Establishment and Search). Since the start of the underwater search in October 2014, there is not anything relevant to this article to add. I do not understand what you mean by merge the "Relatives of passengers" section into "Activities". It is a subsection of activities and the contents do not fit into either the "Search coordination" or "Media" sections, so in my opinion the section is fine. AHeneen (talk) 23:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, both of those were my mistakes. I had the article printed out, and there it is not so clearly visible which level headline it is so I thought that "Relatives of passengers" was seperate from "Activities". As for new developments I am guessing the JACC is not involved in the recent debris finds, since it is not in Australian waters? Assuming so, I am passing this article for GA. Congratulations! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:14, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The JACC is not involved with the recent finds. Thanks for the review. AHeneen (talk) 19:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joint Agency Coordination Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141103024058/http://www.pm.gov.au/media/2014-03-30/air-chief-marshal-angus-houston-lead-joint-agency-coordination-centre to http://www.pm.gov.au/media/2014-03-30/air-chief-marshal-angus-houston-lead-joint-agency-coordination-centre

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:00, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]