Talk:John Wieting/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kavyansh.Singh (talk · contribs) 14:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Nominator: Eddie891 (talk · contribs) at 14:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
GA criteria
[edit]GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Comments
[edit]- Missing short description
- Added
Wieting spent
"He spent"
- sure
After purchasing equipment
specify what type of equipments
- Sure
at the age of forty-five in 1862,
better write 45 in number
- Sure
Mary Elizabeth (Manchester)
suggesting {{nee}}had immigrated to the US
suggesting to spell United StatesHe eventually
replace 'he' with his surnameover seventeen hundred body parts
hyphenate, or write as one-thousand seven-hundredWieting gave talks
any better word than 'talk'?wrote that Wieting's lectures were aimed at shock[ing] and titillat[ing] audiences"
the quote ends but never starts!
- Done all the above
attempting to purchase it for $25,000
suggesting to use {{inflation}}
- Hard to do b/c no exact start year
for 3/4 ownership
use {{Frac}}and was buried in Oakwood Cemetery
fix the disambiguation linkHis mausoleum
whose?
- done the above
- Anything to say about his legacy?
- added some stuff about the opera house
- Image missing ALT text
- Added
- Footnotes all good!
- The following sources are mentioned, but never used as footnotes:
- Keim, Norman O. (2008-06-09). Our Movie Houses: A History of Film and Cinematic Innovation in Central New York. Syracuse University Press. ISBN 978-0-8156-0896-7.
- Hirsch, Foster (2000-09-05). The Boys from Syracuse: The Shuberts' Theatrical Empire. Cooper Square Press. ISBN 978-1-4616-9875-3.
- should be used now
- Inconsistency in writing publication location:
New York, NY
v.Boston, Mass.
.
- hopefully standardized-- cut all I found
- Very high copyvio from https://smiletimegh.com/who-is-john-wieting-biography-career-net-worth/, which is very likely a mirror of Wiki. So, no issues.
That is pretty much all there is to say!
- Thanks, Kavyansh.Singh, what do you think now? Eddie891 Talk Work 17:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Wrapping up
We are pretty much near the end of this review, just take care of the following minor points:
- Add something, a line or two, from the legacy section to the lead
- Sure
- Date format:
2018-06-05
in "References" v.July 28, 2005
in footnotes section. There are a few other instances as well- Should be good now
- How are you ordering "References"? Suggesting to keep it alphabetical.
- Alphabetized
That is it! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 18:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks again, Kavyansh.Singh, What do you think now? Eddie891 Talk Work 13:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Congrats on your zillionth GA! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:04, 21 January 2022 (UTC)