Talk:John Schoonraad
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Family details
[edit]This edit by JSAFleming418G2 removes "excessive information about family member" Tristan because it is "not relevant". I don't necessarily disagree with the principle, but by the same logic we should remove the sentence "Robin has participated in the molding of many of the creatures...". Is there some reason why Robin's work is worth mentioning here but Tristan's is not? Bear in mind that Tristan is a redirect target, with two incoming links, whereas Robin is not and there are no links to Robin Schoonraad (nor any search results for him). If anything I would suggest that Tristan should be kept (for the benefit of the incoming links) and Robin should not.
I've restored the text for Tristan, because of those incoming links, but perhaps we should just move the text to a new stub article for Tristan (if we think he meets the notability requirements). Mitch Ames (talk) 12:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)