Jump to content

Talk:John Reed (actor)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Photo of Reed

[edit]

There are lots of pictures of Reed on the internet. Can someone put one in? I need to get Wiki for dummies! How about one or more of the images at https://www.gsarchive.net/mikado/docimages/docalbum7.html --Ssilvers 17:49, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Performing business

[edit]

This situation with John Reed wearing color glasses and riding a skateboard is a good example of an issue I'm not sure how to resolve. I saw him do this myself. There were no cameras allowed in the theater, probably, so how can this be proved? Is this just a fact that's doomed to oblivion because a respected autority on G&S didn't put it in a book? Penfield June 27, 2006

Right, It's a fun story, and you can write an article for one of the G&S society-type newsletters, or a book that someone could later cite (according to so-and-so, p. 349, Reed did the following). But on Wiki, we really can't say "I saw him do it". But, Reed was reviewed numerous times, and I bet you there are a number of books and articles that can be found where a critic or writer mentioned a similar story about one of Reed's encores. Of course, it takes more work to research it than to just relate your experience, but it's Wiki policy, and if you think about the whole encyclopedia, it is a policy that makes a good deal of sence in terms of controlling the quality (including neutrality and verifiability) of the encyclopedia. -- Ssilvers 04:26, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's one type of encyclopedia policy. I know two people very well who wrote articles for the Britannica, and they most surely were writing off the top of their heads much of the time. No cites, no references, nothing. [Penfield]
They couldn't have been Plaza-Toros!  :)
See http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability Ssilvers 04:26, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Britannica has other means of ensuring that garbage doesn't make it into their articles (not that they are always 100% successful at that). I am not saying that your particular story was "garbage," but if there were no verifiability policy on Wikipedia, most assuredly a ton of "garbage" would make it in, and there would be no principled basis for preventing it. Although it is tedious to seek out verifiable sources, I usually find that anything worth saying in a Wikipedia article can usually be authenticated.
John Reed was reviewed a lot, and if he pulled off this kind of business with any regularity, some reviewer would have commented on it. (And if he didn't do it regularly, is it really "encyclopedic"?) Marc Shepherd 12:54, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Johnreed.jpg

[edit]

Image:Johnreed.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Typo in Times headline

[edit]

The Rothstein story from 1983, as retrieved from the Times web server, has the headline "D'OYLY CARTE BARTIONE [sic] JOINS 'IDA' CELEBRATION" and the URL is consistent with the misspelling: http://www.nytimes.com/1983/12/30/arts/d-oyly-carte-bartione-joins-ida-celebration.html. But the cite in the wiki corrects the misspelling. What, if anything, should be corrected? Dgorsline (talk) 19:15, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

True. I put in the typo and the (sic). -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:47, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected links on John Reed (actor) which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • https://www2.xlibris.com/bookstore/book_excerpt.asp?bookid=29715&page=1
    Triggered by \bxlibris\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:23, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on John Reed (actor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:26, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:John_Reed_(actor)&oldid=1207879239"