Talk:John Mark Ockerbloom
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John Mark Ockerbloom article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Interesting person
[edit]The work of this person is interesting. More should be written on him and his Online Books Page. --Ludvikus 14:10, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Removed "Doctor" in info box
[edit]I've removed the "Doctor" in the infobox simply because I don't think it is the standard around here to do this for every Ph.D. In fact I've never seen it before. There is no intention here of questioning whether he has a Ph.D., I'm almost certain that he does, just on whether this is the standard format. Please revert me if I'm wrong. Smallbones(smalltalk) 15:30, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
The "American Librarians" has a lot of people with questionable notability
[edit]Hi,
I actually am a librarian and I'm also someone who studies "Cluster B" and its prevalence among librarians. There are close to 1100 articles tagged for "American Librarians". I will say - as a librarian - that librarians generally aren't so notable that they should have Wikipedia pages and a lot of these people are I think creating their own Wikipedia pages or pages for their friends & this is really a byproduct of narcissistic tendencies, with narcissism being one of the Cluster B disorders. I recommend going through the pages tagged as "American Librarians" and determining if a lot of these people meet Wikipedia's basic notability guidelines. Most of them probably don't unless they have served as ALA president, ALA executive director, or done things in the field that would make them of interest outside of it. This person is an example of someone who I don't think meets the notability guidelines of having a Wikipedia page. 2600:1700:3BAD:A210:8CA6:FDD:4BC9:4CBD (talk) 04:51, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class Libraries articles
- Mid-importance Libraries articles
- WikiProject Libraries articles
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class University of Pennsylvania articles
- Mid-importance University of Pennsylvania articles
- Articles with connected contributors