This article was nominated for deletion on July 1, 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal John Kaye (politician) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled

See deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Kaye

NPOV

Deleted: "Kaye increased the Greens vote to over 290,000 (7.3%), but due to less favourable preference flows, he was not elected to join Kerry Nettle and Bob Brown." and "The continued strength of the Greens vote suggests he is likely to become the fourth Greens parliamentarian. " becuase neither of these statements are neutral. Comments? Sam Wilson 07:10, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neither is terribly PoV but the latter is mere speculation. The only way it could be saved is by rephrasing it as an extrapolation of the last state election, where 2 Greens MLCs were elected. Which is pretty pointless so you were probably right to delete that sentence.

But that first sentence is not PoV at all. There's nothing PoV about saying that preference flows are favourable when preferences are something everyone wants and needs to get elected. But mentioning Brown is quite irrelevant. I'm going to rephrase it. Nick 14:21, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Fair enough. The intent was to show ongoing relevance in the context of the deletion debate. The new wording is better. PS - What will happen to the deletion debate on the other two former candidates Jenny Leong and David Risstrom. I presume that the keep outcome applies to them too. Chris Maltby 07:27, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Kaye (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160509221852/https://au.news.yahoo.com/nsw/a/31498851/nsw-greens-mp-john-kaye-dies-from-cancer/ to https://au.news.yahoo.com/nsw/a/31498851/nsw-greens-mp-john-kaye-dies-from-cancer/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]