This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Royalty and Nobility, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of royalty and nobility on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Royalty and NobilityWikipedia:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityTemplate:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityRoyalty and Nobility articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: The article comports with all NPR requirements, so I'm marking it as reviewed, but I will note that if there is a possible issue here, it's definitely one of WP:NOTABILITY: between the lack of historical context beyond the man's titles and genealogy, to the massive number of redlinks making it clear that this is a part of a larger and more structured effort to create a network of interrelating biographical articles on German gentry--something easily confirmed by looking at the original author's content contributions, but happily most of the other articles that I randomly checked from the edit history are much better developed, so I am happy to give the benefit of the doubt that this article will see at least some superficial improvements on the somewhat bare bones of the present version. Otherwise I would have concerns about WP:NOTGENEALOGY. But even if a little lacking in encyclopedic meat on the bones as an independent topic, it squeaks by barely I think, and is otherwise well written, formatted, and sufficiently referenced. SnowRise let's rap22:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC).[reply]
