Daring Fireball was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 27 May 2014 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into John Gruber. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting articles
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
"His blog often seeks to refute criticism of Steve Jobs, Apple, and its products." clearly is personal opinion.
I removed it. 80.108.92.3413:31, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually it's not untrue at all. Gruber himself describes himself as "the fanboys' fanboy". His entire raison d'etre is - to use his own words - to be a "Mac snob". And whilst he is sometimes critical of Apple he will most often use underhanded logic to make Apple come up smelling like a rose. This speaks not only for Gruber but for his following and is an important sociological observation. To remove such a sentence without attempting to paraphrase it better is to do something unbecoming of Wikipedia. Note as well the sentence says "often" and not "exclusively". Thus your stating this was a personal opinion is ironically the only personal opinion in this context. The sentence should be paraphrased and restored ASAP. 86.207.164.241
For subjective or synthesis statements, it's a good idea to find a citation or some kind of evidence before adding them to the article. Dreamyshade (talk) 16:51, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello 200.47.22.84 - I wonder if your concerns are mostly about this paragraph, which was added recently and which I just removed:
Entries on the Daring Fireball blog are noted for their length and verbosity (as well as their injudicious use of quoting). Whilst some people – most notably from the so-called "fan boy" community – laud this style as being indicative of his depth of knowledge regarding the Mac platform, others are less sure of his position to make comment [1]. This scepticism is backed up by the fact that John Gruber has no software to his name aside from a handful of AppleScripts.
There may be a grain of truth in there somewhere, but the supporting citation is a opinion post, not a reliable source, so it doesn't belong in the article. Dreamyshade (talk) 18:33, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Is this guy notable enough to have a Wikipedia page?
I don't see any indication that he has done anything that millions of other people have: He writes a blog and gives talks. What reason is there for keeping this page? Aardvark92 (talk) 20:34, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
He invented Markdown, which created a revolution in publishing on the web. And created controversy for a decade by his public attacks on anyone who tried to improve on his original buggy Perl script, or to standardize the markup format, including some of the most popular web sites. Perhaps some of the discussion about Gruber and the many sources about him from the Markdown page should be copied or paraphrased here, or rewritten more from the point of view of Gruber the person. But there can't be any question about his notability. I'm removing the notability template. If someone wants to add a stub template, that I could hear. StormWillLaugh (talk) 14:11, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think there needs to be some substantiation for the claim that Markdown created a "revolution in publishing on the web".
I'm not saying Gruber isn't notable, I just think he hasn't necessarily been shown notable yet. I also think his notability would be easier to establish via his Apple enthusiast blog, which has given him far more name recognition than Markdown. Filjil (talk) 11:47, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
He's pretty well known in tech community, for several things he does now and has done in the past. So yes, perfectly acceptable for WP. Not everyone on here has to be Michael Jackson level of fame before having a page, lol. Jimthing (talk) 16:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In its current state, this article overuses primary sources to the point of violating the no original research policy. Specifically, WP:PSTS states: "Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources, and to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources." In contrast, almost all of the content in this article cites Gruber's own blog and podcast instead of independent secondary sources, which makes this article more of a fan page than an encyclopedia entry. Please remember that secondary sources are preferred on Wikipedia and limit the use of primary sources to avoid giving undue weight to aspects of the article subject that are not covered by independent reliable sources. — Newslingertalk05:08, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
