Jump to content

Talk:John D. Burgess

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Why has this been marked for speedy deletion? The article, even in its first incarnation, made the subject's importance perfectly clear - "one of the most eminent of Scots bagpipers".Quelcrime (talk) 13:16, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming of article

[edit]

I see this article has been renamed from "John Burgess (bagpiper)" to "John D. Burgess". I believe this is a mistake. I have never seen the subject referred to as "John D. Burgess". He is always called "John Burgess". Putting the middle initial into people's names as a matter of course is a North American habit which looks extremely odd in the case of a Scot who does not appear to have followed this practice. I don't believe anyone searching for an article on Burgess would search for "John D. Burgess", and given a list of article titles they most likely wouldn't pick this out as the article they were looking for. Under the circumstances I believe the article should be returned to its original title, which gives the subject's commonly used name, with a characteristic to distinguish him from others with the same name. "John Burgess (bagpiper)" is instantly identifiable. "John D. Burgess" is not.Quelcrime (talk) 19:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see it the other way - as far as I can tell, he is normally called John D. Burgess. For example in a Google search for "john burgess piper", every single result refers to him as John D. Burgess, and it is similar for pipe major john burgess. That is also the name of the 6/8 march named after him Ostrichyearning (talk) 23:29, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John D. Burgess. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:56, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]