Talk:John Artz Farmhouse

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Non specific Commons Category

I have included a link to the Commons category: National Register of Historic Places in Fairfield County, Ohio. The primary reference for this article is it's National Register inventory form. The standard for a quality WP article is that it allows the reader to make a fairly complete study of the subject.

In studying the John Artz Farmhouse and completing the nomination for the NRHP, the author wrote, "The gable front end and two story wing plan of the Artz house is not as common in the county... A review of Ohio Historic Inventory forms... ...supports this assessment" In the discussion that follows the author mentions specifically the Henry Musser House and the Pugh-Kettle House. Comparisons with these and other historic structures in the area that are on the NRHP are made. Both the details of the architecture and the historic relation to the other NRHP properties in the county are discussed.

Photographs of the Musser, Pugh-Kettle and Artz houses are in the above Commons category. If the study of the property cited for notability, used for facts and entered into the Register discusses the properties in that category, surely a somewhat complete study would require an examination of available photos of them. I certainly welcome an editor who can expand the article to include a paraphrasing of the discussion in the nomination and incorporate the images in the article with the links to the WP articles. Even with a set of selected photos, a study of a historically significant building that neglected an overview of the county's other historic resources would be far from complete.

Not including the link to the Commons category for the county (finest level of detail accurate) detracts from the encyclopedia's presentation of the information necessary for a fairly complete study of the subject. Not providing a link to some form of visual representation related to an article reduces accessibility for some readers. I don't see any policy that discourages such a link. I have a hard time seeing the way an article, particularly a stub is degraded by the presence of a small link to a closely related category on WP:SIS a sister project. MrBill3 (talk) 07:30, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]