Talk:Johannes Bredenburg

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Philosophy: Philosophers / Modern Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Modern philosophy

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Notes

Listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Hotlist of History of Ideas. Most sources will be in Dutch so needs to be expanded by a Dutch/English speaker. Canuck100 (talk) 21:14, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References need updating

Hi,

The link for the only reference to this article, as it stands today, does not lead to the PDF document referred to, which was apparently in English and is apparently no longer available. It leads to a "No document found" on the corresponding website. I suspect that the document referred to, whether in English or Dutch, was only an exhibition catalogue and was therefore never printed in substantial quantities nor available electronically.

The following is probably the most indepth analysis of Johannes Bredenburg (in Dutch): L. (Wiep) van Bunge, Johannes Bredenburg (1643-1691). "Een Rotterdamse collegiant in de ban van Spinoza" (A Collegiant from Rotterdam under the Spell of Spinoza", PhD dissertation, Rotterdam 1990, Erasmus University, http://repub.eur.nl/pub/37828/

I would be happy if someone could confirm whether an English description of Bredenburg can be found, as I strongly suspect, here: Wiep van Bunge, Henri Krop, Bart Leeuwenburgh, Paul Schuurman, Han van Ruler, Michiel Wielema (editors), "Dictionary of Seventeenth and Eighteenth-Century Dutch Philosophers", 2003

This would probably be an excellent English-language source.

It would be good to have a reference to the statement in the article: "In the end, he was dissatisfied by his own rebuttal, refuted it, and came to adopt Spinoza's ideas." Is that really true?

Marc.riese (talk) 09:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've just read a chapter in Jonathan Israel 's authoritative book [Radical Enlightenment] which is about Bredenburg. Chapter 19 Seems to agree with the version given here. Szczels (talk) 10:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Johannes Bredenburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927221032/http://www.ritmanlibrary.nl/c/r/pdf/spinoza-libertas-philosophandi.pdf to http://www.ritmanlibrary.nl/c/r/pdf/spinoza-libertas-philosophandi.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:33, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]