This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
as far as I know neither Loschmidt nor Avrogradro knew about the number named after them. My professor said that Loschmidt just measured the size of the molecules. But he did not actually think of calculating the number FelixP09:48, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
According to Avogadro's number: Early values by Loschmidt and others by Hawthorne, Robert M., Jr. (J. Chem. Ed 47, 1970) the value for Avogadro's constant calculated from Loschmidt's data is 4.10*10^22, not the suspiciously accurate value claimed here. I cannot access this article, but if someone can please verify this and correct the value if necessary. In any case Loschmidt tried only to measure the size of the molecules, not the number, just as FelixP says. --89.236.66.20610:56, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Some minor information and links have been included.
To mark the era a little from the history of Kinetic Theory of Gases has been quoted, with minor formatting.
Hope they will be liked by the readers.
If not liked, my insolence may please be tolerated, as the minor additions helped me appreciate the perspective better. Bkpsusmitaa (talk) 05:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
