Jump to content

Talk:Johann Dietrich von Hülsen/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 05:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Lead and infobox;
    • Johann Dietrich von Hülsen (born 1 June 1693 in Babaziens, died 29 May 1767 in Berlin); just the date range is enough, no need of geographical details fixed
    • general lieutenant? I think it is to be "lieutenant general" yes (In English)
    • In the infobox the rank is mentioned as general. But as far as I can see per the prose, the highest rank attained by him was "lieutenant general" done
  • Section 1;
    • (1. Philipp von Weyherr, 2. Christoph Rudolf von Schliewitz); This is not necessary, out of context moved to note
  • Section 2;
    • Then rank of Otto Magnus von Doenhoff? done
    • Modern equivalent of Fahnrich in braces done
    • Link all the military ranks throughout the article on the first mention—second lieutenant, first lieutenant, major etc. done
    • Then rank of Erhard Ernst von Roeder? done
    • promoted to Captain; no need to initial capitals just "captain" done
  • Section 2.1;
    • Then rank of Leopold I of Anhalt-Dessau? done
    • Then rank of Asmus Ehrenreich von Bredow? done
    • Halberstadt is over-linked
  • Section 2.2;
    • Then rank of Joachim Christian von Tresckow? done
    • Then rank of Hans Joachim von Zieten? done
  • Section 3; all good
  • 5.7% confidence, violation unlikely.
Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:13, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]